Search Results for "arbitrator bias"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitrator bias"

166 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Arbitrator's Award of Interest on Escalation Amount Upheld as Not Contrary to Contract Terms.

6 Feb 2013

The case involves an appeal by Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation against a judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Dealership Dispute. Court Appoints Former Judge as Sole Arbitrator After Respondent Fails to Concur with Applicant's Proposal for Appointment.

16 Jun 2015

The applicant, L.A. Motors Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an ar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Rejecting Claim for Balance Payment Under Cable Laying Contract. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Deductions and Lack of Evidence, Holding No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Jun 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Reunion Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd., was awarded a contract on 23 January 2002 by the respondent, M/s. Petronet MHB Ltd., to lay ca...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — CMD's Ineligibility to Act as Arbitrator Renders Appointment Void Ab Initio. Express Agreement in Writing Under Section 12(5) Proviso Must Be Post-Dispute and Cannot Be Inferred from Pre-Dispute Conduct.

10 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Broadband Network Limited (BBNL) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had rejecte...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Remits Matter for Fresh Consideration on Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal. Court finds that the Arbitral Tribunal was improperly constituted without obtaining petitioner's waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and remits the matter for fresh adjudication by a properly constituted tribunal.

20 Jan 2026

The petitioner, RPN Engineers Chennai Private Limited, was awarded a contract by the respondents (Integral Coach Factory, Chennai) vide Letter of Acce...

High Court

High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Contract Dated 27.09.2013.

8 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Sobha Projects and Trade Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Despite Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Notice Period. The court held that the respondent's failure to respond to the notice and its conduct constituted waiver of the 30-day notice requirement under Clause 64(3)(b)(ii) of the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract.

3 Apr 2024

The applicant, S. N. Naik & Brothers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with the Union of India (respondent) on 23.09.2019 for constructi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2013

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Render Award and Excessive Fees — Substitute Arbitrator Appointed Under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that failure to render award within reasonable time and demanding excessive fees constitute failure to act under Section 14(1)(a) of the Act.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Parekh Industries Limited, filed a petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking terminatio...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)