Search Results for "Notional Promotion"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Employee in Service Rule Relaxation Dispute. High Court's Quashing of Government Order Granting Promotion Set Aside as Relaxation Was Validly Granted.

The Supreme Court heard two sets of appeals arising from a judgment of the Madras High Court in Writ Appeal No. 996 of 2015 and an order dismissing Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Directs State to Consider Promotion of Retired Employee After Exoneration in Disciplinary Enquiries. The Court held that since no disciplinary enquiry is pending and the petitioner has been exonerated, the State must consider his promotion as per DPC decisions of 1996.

The petitioner, F H Shaikh, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the State of Gujar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Probation Period — Confirmation Dates Back to Initial Appointment. Movement from Semi-Skilled to Skilled Grade is Confirmation/Upgradation, Not Promotion, and Seniority Must Be Fixed from Date of Initial Appointment.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by V. Vincent Velankanni against the Union of India and others, setting aside the judgment of the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruit District Judge's Claim for Seniority Over Promotees in Kerala Higher Judicial Service. Notional Seniority Granted from Date of Initial Appointment of Other Direct Recruits in Same Selection.

The case involves a dispute over seniority between direct recruit District Judges and promotees appointed by transfer in the Kerala Higher Judicial Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Among Promoted Officers in Telecommunications Engineering Service. ROTA Rule Not Applicable Where Statutory Recruitment Rules Do Not Provide for Rotation of Vacancies Between Quota Streams.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the inter se seniority of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDEs) in the Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group 'B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order in Railway Promotion Dispute — Criteria for Assessment of Candidates for PHOD Post Held Arbitrary. The Court directed review DPC for notional promotion from date juniors were promoted with consequential benefits.

The Union of India and another (petitioners) challenged the judgment and order dated 23rd January 2001 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India and Commissioner of Central Excise Challenging CAT Order Quashing Reversion of Adhoc Promotee. Reversion of an employee promoted on adhoc basis upon revocation of suspension is illegal; employee entitled to reinstatement in promotional post.

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Central Excise filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mum...