Search Results for "MRTP Act reservation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "MRTP Act reservation"

296 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 296 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period. Purchase Notice Served Under Section 127(1) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Not Followed by Acquisition Within Two Years, Resulting in Deemed Lapsing of Reservation.

27 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Shree Vinayak Builders & Developers, owned land admeasuring 6377.12 Sq.Mts. in Nagpur, which was reserved for a 24-meter wide DP Road ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Reservation for Transport Terminus Due to Lapse Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Reservation Deemed Lapsed as Acquisition Not Initiated Within Ten Years from Publication of Development Plan.

9 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Nandkishor s/o Babulal Agrawal, is the owner of land Survey No. 505/04 admeasuring 1.07 H.R situated at Dhule. Out of this land, 67 R ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Impugned Letter Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under Section 49(7) of MRTP Act. Court Holds That Failure to Initiate Acquisition Under Section 126 Within One Year of Confirmed Purchase Notice Leads to Automatic Lapse, and Deems Development Permission Granted Under Section 45(5) Due to Non-communication of Decision.

4 Dec 2017

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Beed town, challenged the continuing reservation of their land as a garden in the development plan of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Building Permission Due to Playground Reservation Under MRTP Act. Notice Under Section 127 Held Not Premature as 10-Year Period for Acquisition Had Expired.

13 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Irfan Allabaksh Shaikh, owned land bearing CTS No. 6167 in Siddheshwar Peth, Solapur, which was reserved as a playground (site No. 319...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation of Land for Garden and Playground Under MRTP Act — Failure to Commence Acquisition Within 10 Years Renders Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127. The court held that the lapse under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 occurs automatically upon expiry of 10 years from the date of the plan coming into force, regardless of whether a notice under Section 126 was served.

9 Jan 2015

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of lands described in paragraph 3 of the petition, challenged the reservation of their lands for a garden and p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. Land reserved for postal staff quarters since 1979 becomes free from reservation after notice under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.

21 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Balkrishna Jagannath Lad, owned land bearing survey No. 103/12/1D/1A at Pandharpur within the limits of Pandharpur Municipal Council. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Dereservation of Land Under MRTP Act — Reservation Lapses Due to Non-Acquisition Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. The court held that mere passing of a resolution for acquisition does not constitute steps for acquisition under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

30 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Madanlal Lalchand Jain, owned land bearing S.No. 38/3 at Nandurbar. The Assistant Director of Town Planning published a draft developm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition on Lapsing of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act — Purchase Notice After Ten Years from Final Development Plan but Before Ten Years from Revised Development Plan Triggers Lapsing of Reservation. The Court held that the period of ten years for serving a purchase notice under Section 127 is to be reckoned from the date of the final development plan, not the revised development plan.

4 May 2023

The petitioners, owners of land in Mohpa, Nagpur, filed a writ petition challenging the continued reservation of their land for a weekly market and sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Reservations in Development Plan Under MRTP Act. Reservations for MSEB Extension and School/Playground Quashed as Not Acquired Within 10 Years, Land Deemed De-reserved.

6 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge, owned land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares at Kagal, District Kolhapur. The Government of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against 50% TDR Curtailment for Surrendered Land Under MRTP Act. Held that Development Control Regulations cannot override statutory entitlement under Section 126 of the MRTP Act, 1966.

13 Nov 2025

The petitioners, M/s. Aswani Associates and Shri Sandeep Rasiklal Shah, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 17 October 2017 passed by the...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)