Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Reservations in Development Plan Under MRTP Act. Reservations for MSEB Extension and School/Playground Quashed as Not Acquired Within 10 Years, Land Deemed De-reserved.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 105
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge, owned land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares at Kagal, District Kolhapur. The Government of Maharashtra sanctioned a revised development plan for Kagal Municipal Council under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) in 1986. In this plan, the petitioner's land was reserved for two purposes: reservation no.8 for extension of Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and reservation no.9 for a primary school and playground. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash these reservations and to be permitted to develop the land. The core legal issue was whether the reservations had lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, which provides that if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within 10 years from the date of the plan's sanction, the reservation ceases to operate and the land is deemed to be de-reserved. The petitioner argued that more than 10 years had passed since the 1986 plan was sanctioned and no acquisition proceedings had been initiated. The respondents, including the Municipal Council and the State, did not dispute the factual position but contended that the plan was revised later. The court, after hearing arguments, held that the statutory period of 10 years had expired without any acquisition, and therefore the reservations had lapsed. The court allowed the petition, quashing the reservations and directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to develop the land in accordance with law. The judgment was pronounced on 6 October 2014 by a division bench of Justices A.S. Oka and G.S. Kulkarni.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Reservation Lapse - Section 127 MRTP Act, 1966 - Land reserved for public purposes in development plan - If not acquired within 10 years from date of plan sanction, reservation lapses and land is deemed de-reserved - Petitioner's land reserved in 1986 plan for MSEB extension and school/playground - No acquisition proceedings initiated within 10 years - Held that reservation has lapsed and petitioner is entitled to develop land (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation of the petitioner's land in the development plan of Kagal Municipal Council for the purposes of extension of MSEB and for a primary school and playground has lapsed due to non-acquisition within the statutory period under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashing reservation nos.8 and 9 in the development plan of Kagal Municipal Council in respect of the petitioner's land. The respondents were directed to permit the petitioner to develop the land in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Reservation of land in development plan lapses if not acquired within 10 years
  • Section 127 of MRTP Act
  • 1966
  • De-reservation upon expiry of period
  • Writ jurisdiction under Article 226
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (10) 40

Writ Petition No.1226 of 2011

2014-10-06

A.S. Oka, G.S. Kulkarni

Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. V.B. Rajure for Petitioner; Mr. Tanaji Mhatugade for Respondent No.1; Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 & 4; Mr. Rajendra P. Gurjar i/b M.V. Kini & Co for Respondent Nos.5 and 6

Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge

The Municipal Council, Kagal; Chief Officer/Planning Officer, Kagal Municipal Council; The Assistant Director Town Planning, Kolhapur; The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging reservations of land in a development plan.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of reservation nos.8 and 9 in the development plan of Kagal Municipal Council for extension of MSEB and for a primary school and playground, and direction to permit development of the land.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's land was reserved in the 1986 development plan for public purposes, but no acquisition proceedings were initiated within the statutory period of 10 years under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, 1966.

Issues

Whether the reservation of the petitioner's land in the development plan has lapsed due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, 1966.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the land was reserved in the 1986 development plan and more than 10 years have passed without any acquisition proceedings, hence the reservation has lapsed. Respondents did not dispute the factual position but contended that the plan was revised later.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, if land reserved for a public purpose in a development plan is not acquired within 10 years from the date of sanction of the plan, the reservation lapses and the land is deemed to be de-reserved. The petitioner is entitled to develop the land.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner has prayed that the reservation nos.8 and 9 made in the development plan of the year 1986 of the Kagal Municipal Council... be quashed and set aside. The Petitioner is the owner of the land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares situated at Kagal...

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2011. Rule was issued and respondents waived service. By consent of counsel, the petition was taken up for final hearing. Judgment was reserved on 27 August 2014 and pronounced on 6 October 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 127
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Reservations in Development Plan Under MRTP Act. Reservations for MSEB Extension and School/Playground Quashed as Not Acquired Within 10 Years, Land Deemed De-reserved.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close friend of deceased and his testim...