Search Results for "MCGM policy"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against Order Quashing MPSC Selection Process for Non-Compliance with Reservation Roster. Court Held That MPSC's Failure to Maintain 200-Point Roster for Backlog Vacancies Violated Constitutional Mandate Under Articles 16(4) and 16(4B).

The case involves multiple review petitions and a contempt petition arising from a writ petition filed by Makrand Subhash Dagadkhair challenging the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Cessed Building Without Compliance with Section 354 of MMC Act and DCR 33(7) — Held that Municipal Corporation must follow statutory procedure before demolition of dilapidated buildings.

The petitioners, tenants residing in a cessed building known as Martand Prasad Building in Malad (West), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction in Cooperative Society — Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Authorization for Construction on Society Property.

The petitioners, residents and shop owners of Bandra Ashoka Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of cert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Municipal Pensioners Association Against Differential Pension Revision. Differential treatment of pre-2000 retirees violates Article 14; MCGM directed to revise pensions equally.

The petitioner, Mumbai Municipal Pensioners Association, representing pensioners who retired from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenges to Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award on termination and damages but modifies interest rate and clarifies that the builder is entitled to retain constructed area as per agreement.

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Monitoring Committee's Order in Mukesh Mills Redevelopment Case — CRZ-II Zoning and Development Control Regulations Apply to Textile Mill Land.

The petitioners, M/s TCI Industries Ltd and its Executive Director, owned a large property in Colaba, Mumbai, known as Mukesh Mills, a former cotton t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Licences for Unauthorised Construction on Gaothan Land. Petitioners Failed to Establish Right to Regularisation Under Development Control Regulations.

The petitioners, various societies and associations, filed writ petitions challenging the cancellation of their trade licences by the Municipal Corpor...