Search Results for "Additional director"

5867 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5867 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Promotion to Director (Legal) Post in Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission — Petitioner Not Entitled to Automatic Promotion Despite Holding Additional Charge.

The petitioner, Anilkumar S/o Rupchand Ukey, was the Deputy Director (Legal) of the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (the Commission) sin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Against Summons for Offence Under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 for Alleged Violation of Rule 79-A(b) of Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Director Argues Lack of Vicarious Liability and Procedural Flaws, but Full Order Not Available.

The revision petition was filed by a director of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing beverages, seeking to qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MPSC and State Petitions Challenging MAT Order on Shortlisting Criteria for Director of Health Services. Recruitment Rules Mandate Consideration of All Eligible Candidates, Not Shortlisting.

The case involves a challenge by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) and the State of Maharashtra against an order of the Maharashtra Adm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Non-Compliance of Section 138 Notice Requirements. Notice sent to Director at residential address not shown as registered office or known address under Section 138 NI Act, 1881.

The applicant, Shehzad Valimohammad Merchant, was a director of Landmark Real Estate Developers Limited. The company entered into a Memorandum of Unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Allegations of Active Role in Business Conduct.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Mr. H.S. Bedi (Managing Director) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Directors Not in Charge of Company Affairs at Relevant Time. Section 138 NI Act Liability Requires Active Role in Business; Vicarious Liability Not Automatic for All Directors.

The petitioners, Heena Thirumali Sateesh and Hanumanth Inamdar, were directors of Hoysala Projects Private Limited. The respondent, M/s Minimelt Engin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Consent or Neglect. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Without Clear Averments of Their Role in the Offence.

The applicants, who are directors of M/s. Bunge India Private Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedur...