Search Results for "APMC Rules"

90 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Voting Rights for APMC Representatives in Legislative Council Elections. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Not a Local Authority Under Article 171 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Radhakishan Deorao Pathade, Chairman of the Super Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Aurangabad, filed a writ petition seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Co-option of Member in APMC for Violation of Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Failure to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Object Renders Co-option Invalid.

The petitioners, Sadashiv Pandurang Patil and Audumbar Gorakh More, were members of the Karmala Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). They cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Market Committee and Licensee in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Licensee Estopped from Denying Licensor's Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act, 1872; Market Committee Not Necessary Party in Co-owner Dispute.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a shop in a market yard. The plaintiffs, Mohammad Hanif Abdul Wahid Shaikh and Mohammad Asif Mohammad H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Grampanchayats to Participate in APMC Elections as Nominees of Local Authorities Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Grampanchayat Held to Be a Local Authority Entitled to Nominate Members to APMC Under Section 11 of the Act.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats (village councils) in Maharashtra challenging the rejection of their nomination form...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Administrator for APMC Ghatanji Due to Expiry of Managing Committee's Term. Postponement of Elections Does Not Imply Extension of Tenure Under Section 15A of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Relationship of Employer and Employee Established Between Market Committee and Licensed Weighman.

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Solapur, and its Chairman filed a writ petition challenging a Labour Court award dated 29 November 1997, wh...