High Court of Karnataka Quashes Merger Notification of APMC Devadurga with APMC Raichur for Violation of Natural Justice. Notification under Section 5(1) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 set aside as no opportunity of hearing was given to affected parties.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, including individual residents and a cotton merchants association, challenged a notification dated 27.04.2017 issued by the State of Karnataka directing the merger/amalgamation of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) of Devadurga Taluka with the APMC of Raichur District. The petitioners contended that the notification was issued without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing to the affected parties, including the APMC Devadurga and its stakeholders. The court examined the provisions of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966, particularly Section 5(1) which empowers the government to merge market committees. The court found that the impugned notification was issued in violation of principles of natural justice as no hearing was afforded to the petitioners or the APMC Devadurga. The court quashed the notification and directed the respondents to consider the matter afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The decision was based on the fundamental principle that any administrative action affecting rights must be preceded by a fair hearing.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - Merger of APMCs - Section 5(1) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 - The petitioners challenged the notification dated 27.04.2017 directing merger of APMC Devadurga with APMC Raichur. The court held that the notification was issued without giving any opportunity of hearing to the affected parties, violating principles of natural justice. The notification was quashed. (Paras 1-5)

B) Agricultural Marketing - Merger of Market Committees - Section 5(1) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 - The court observed that the power to merge market committees under Section 5(1) must be exercised in a fair manner, and any decision affecting rights must be preceded by a hearing. The impugned notification was set aside. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned notification dated 27.04.2017 directing merger/amalgamation of APMC Devadurga with APMC Raichur is valid and whether the petitioners were afforded an opportunity of hearing before issuance of the notification.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the impugned notification dated 27.04.2017 and directed the respondents to consider the matter afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Merger of APMCs
  • Section 5(1) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act
  • 1966
  • Quashing of notification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (09) 23

Writ Petition Nos.21556/2017 & 21988/2017 (APMC) and Writ Petition No.202391/2017 (APMC)

2017-09-20

S. Sujatha

Sri Arunkumar A., Sri Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Sri R.V. Nadagouda, Sri Mallikarjun C. Basareddy

Sri Ramanagoud, Sri Anjaneyya, Taluka Cotton Merchants Association

State of Karnataka, Director of Agricultural Marketing Department, Deputy Director of Agricultural Marketing Department, Deputy Commissioner Raichur, Secretary of APMC Deodurga, Secretary of APMC Raichur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the notification dated 27.04.2017 directing merger/amalgamation of APMC Devadurga with APMC Raichur.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned notification dated 27.04.2017.

Filing Reason

The notification was issued without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and affected parties, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the impugned notification dated 27.04.2017 directing merger/amalgamation of APMC Devadurga with APMC Raichur is valid? Whether the petitioners were afforded an opportunity of hearing before issuance of the notification?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the notification was issued without any prior notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents argued that the merger was in public interest and no hearing was required.

Ratio Decidendi

Any administrative action affecting rights must be preceded by a fair hearing. The power to merge market committees under Section 5(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in a manner consistent with principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners have challenged the notification dated 27.04.2017 issued by respondent No.1 herein, whereby, the merger/amalgamation of APMC of Devadurga with APMC of Raichur is directed to be amalgamated. The impugned notification is quashed. The respondents are directed to consider the matter afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed on 13.09.2017 and reserved for orders. The court pronounced the order on 20.09.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966: Section 5(1)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Merger Notification of APMC Devadurga with APMC Raichur for Violation of Natural Justice. Notification under Section 5(1) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 set aside as ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Anticipatory Bail in Money Laundering Case Due to Misapplication of Section 45 PMLA. High Court's Grant of Bail Set Aside for Failing to Apply Rigour of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and Consider Seriousness of Schedu...