Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order of Cooperative Society Director for Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Registrar's Order under Section 29A of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 set aside as no show-cause notice or hearing was given before suspension.

The petitioner, Prakash Ramachandra Hegde, was a director of Dodmane Group Village Seva Cooperative Society. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Socie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice and Retrospective Amendment to Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 — Upholds Validity of Officers' Powers and Amendment.

The petitioner, Sunil Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a show caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Customs Duty Demand for Goods Imported at Different Port. Commissioner of Customs, Bombay lacks jurisdiction to demand duty for goods imported at New Delhi under an advance licence after change of port of registration.

The petitioner, Vimal Nath, carrying on business as M/s Sharika Intl, was issued an advance licence on 16/2/1994 by licensing authorities at Delhi per...