Search Results for "fraud/misrepresentation"

948 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 948 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidity Orders in Thakar Tribe Certificate Cases. Held that the Committee failed to consider relevant documents and applied incorrect principles, violating principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by members of the Chitale family challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Deputy Director of Education to Decide on Shalarth Identity Grant for Approved Teacher. Administrative Inaction Cured by Court Order Directing Timely Decision on Pending Proposal.

The petitioner, Shri Yogesh Jaysing Patil, a teacher appointed at Sonyachi Shiroli High School, had his appointment and services approved by the Educa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Venture Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked for disputes arising from Joint Venture Agreement dated 28th March, 2007.

The applicant, M/s. Atul & Arkade Realty, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Service Dispute — Upholds Appointment of Assistant Public Prosecutor. The Court held that the selection committee's decision was not vitiated by bias or procedural irregularity, and the Tribunal's order setting aside the appointment was erroneous.

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar, was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor-cum-Assistant Government Pleader by an order dated 10.11.2010. The third res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise Decree in Partition Suit: Third Party Not Permitted to Invoke Article 226 Against Lok Adalat Award. Writ Remedy Not Available to Strangers to Decree; Proper Recourse Is to File a Separate Suit for Declaration and Partition.

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by five individuals claiming to be members of the same family as t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Employees Appointed Without Following Statutory Recruitment Rules in Education Sector. Appointments Made Without Approval of Competent Authority and Without Following Reservation Policy Are Void Ab Initio.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, disposed of four writ petitions filed by employees challenging their termination from service. The petitioners we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reopening of Partition Permitted Due to Non-Inclusion of Joint Family Property. The Court held that a prior partition decree not binding on the plaintiff as she was not a party and the property was joint family property.

The appellant, Monakka Shinde, filed a suit (O.S. 370/2004) for reopening of partition, declaration, and injunction against her sons, Maruti Shinde an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...