Search Results for "civil suit challenging arbitration"

656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court of Bombay: Commercial Arbitration Appeal" "Exploring the scope of judicial review under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, addressing readiness, willingness, and compensation issues in a shareholder dispute."

Arbitration Scope: The Court clarified the restrictive jurisdiction under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing minim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Revision Application in Civil Suit for Recovery of Rent — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application for Rejection of Plaint Dismissed by Trial Court Set Aside. Plaint Rejected for Lack of Cause of Action as Lease Agreement Not Signed by Defendant.

The petitioner, Indus Towers Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12%. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach and damages are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Agarsons Container Terminals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Court Upholds Award of Mesne Profits and Rejection of Set-Off Claim Under Specific Relief Act and Partnership Act

The case involves three writ petitions filed by M/s Resources International, Mr. Dipak M. Rajani, Mrs. Meena D. Rajani, and M/s Resourceful Earthmover...