KAHC010026042017_1
9 Mar 2018...
Search Results for "plant engineering"
353 result(s) found
Found 353 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Construction of World's Highest Railway Bridge. Division Bench's Interference with Concurrent Findings of Arbitral Tribunal and Single Judge Set Aside for Exceeding Section 37 Scope.
18 Jul 2023The appeal arises from a dispute between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (appellant) and Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (respondent) concerning ...
- 150
High Court
High Court of Bombay Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Order in Labour Dispute. Industrial Court Had Stayed Settlement and Directed Interim Wage Increase, Raising Questions on Unfair Labour Practices and Binding Nature of Settlements Under MRTU & PULP Act.
17 Jul 2018The matter arose from a challenge to an interim order passed by the Industrial Court on 31 July 2017 in a complaint of unfair labour practices under t...
- 34
High Court
Madras High Court Allows TIIC's Recovery Petition Against Guarantors in SFC Act Case — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Liability of Guarantors Under Sections 31(a) and 31(aa) of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Survives Liquidation of Principal Borrower and Receipt of Amount from Official Liquidator.
7 Jan 2025The petitioner, Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited (TIIC), a State Financial Corporation, filed an original petition under Sections ...
- 104
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in BIFR Proceedings — Sale Under Securitisation Act Completed, No Jurisdiction Remains with BIFR. The court held that once action under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation Act is taken to its logical end, BIFR loses jurisdiction, and interim relief cannot be granted to disturb a concluded sale.
19 May 2010The petitioner, Nouveaw Exports Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13th...
- 68
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Orders Independent Investigation into Alleged Pegasus Spyware Surveillance to Uphold Constitutional Rights. Court Emphasizes Judicial Review and Protection of Privacy Under Articles 19 and 21 of Constitution, While Addressing National Security Concerns and Government's Denial of Allegations.
27 Oct 2021The Supreme Court of India addressed a batch of writ petitions concerning allegations of unauthorized surveillance using Pegasus spyware on Indian cit...
- 309
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute, Upholds Plausible Contract Interpretation. High Court Exceeded Section 37 Jurisdiction by Substituting Its Own Construction of Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement.
27 May 2019The dispute arose from a Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement (CMDA) executed on 16.07.2008 between Parsa Kente Collieries Limited (appellant) and Rajas...
- 458
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014
30 Apr 2015The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...
- 15
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Holds that Taking Insurance Policy for Commercial Premises is for Commercial Purpose, Excluding Complainant from Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court ruled that a commercial entity taking fire insurance policy for its business premises is not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, as the policy is taken for commercial purpose.
13 Apr 2023The present appeals by special leave assail the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 2004 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Na...
- 169
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.
3 Oct 2024The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...
- 1352
