Search Results for "Liquidation"

685 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 685 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Orders Dropping of Proceedings Against Mistakenly Arrested Person in Company Liquidation Case — Violation of Article 21. Applicant arrested due to similarity of father's name with ex-director of company in liquidation, despite not being the same person.

The applicant, Sri Ningaraju N, filed an application under Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 seeking dropping of proceedings against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NCLT Order Directing State to Permit Windmill Operations in Insolvency Case. NCLT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Exercising Judicial Review Over Administrative Decision, Following Supreme Court Decision in Embassy Property Developments v. State of Karnataka.

The dispute arose out of insolvency proceedings against M/s Wind World (India) Limited, which held a lease over forest land for operating windmills. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Limitation in Insolvency Petition Initiated by Financial Creditor. Application Under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Held Within Limitation After Excluding Time Spent in SARFAESI Proceedings Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissing an appeal against an order of the National Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Limitation Dispute — Application Under Section 7 Held Barred by Limitation. Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets Does Not Extend Limitation for Initiating CIRP Under IBC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Babulal Vardharji Gurjar, a director of Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., against the order of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Execution Against Bhumidhari Rights and Trees Under U.P. Encumbered Estates Act. Bhumidhari Rights Held Not to be Proprietary Rights, and Trees Not Vesting in State are Debtor's Property Liable to Execution.

The dispute arose from execution proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh Encumbered Estates Act, 1934. The predecessors-in-interest of the appellants were...