High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicated Interim Application for Summary Judgment in Commercial Admiralty Suit Seeking Recovery of Port, Berthing, Salvage, and Associated Charges Against a Vessel. Summary Judgment Sought Under Order XIII-A Read with Order XII Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for Rs.9,37,19,098 with Interest at 18% Per Annum on Ground That Claims Were Admitted/Undisputed and Defendants Had No Real Prospect of Successfully Defending.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present matter was an Interim Application filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in its Admiralty and Vice Admiralty Jurisdiction. The Applicant/Plaintiff, Angre Port Private Ltd, sought a summary judgment against the 1st Defendant Vessel, Tag 15 (IMO 9705550), under Order XIII-A read with Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The claim was quantified at Rs.9,37,19,098 along with interest at 18% per annum from 18th December 2020 till payment or realization and poundage. The Plaintiff alleged that the dues were admitted or undisputed and that the Defendants had no real prospect of successfully defending the claim. The underlying suit was filed against the vessel invoking admiralty jurisdiction. The vessel had entered the Plaintiff's port on 13th February 2019 and occupied berth space. The Plaintiff rendered berthing and port services as per its Tariff Booklet and raised invoices from time to time. On 4th March 2019, EXIM Bank, a secured creditor of the vessel's owner Tag Offshore Ltd, filed a separate admiralty suit and obtained arrest of the vessel. Insolvency proceedings were initiated against Tag Offshore Ltd under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on 24th April 2019, and an Interim Resolution Professional was appointed. Due to lack of supplies and stores, the crew abandoned the vessel on 7th May 2019. On 16th June 2019, during monsoon, the vessel broke mooring lines and drifted, posing navigational hazards; the Plaintiff deployed a tug named TUG SHAMBHAVI to salvage and bring it back to safe harbour. The Resolution Professional was later appointed, and on 26th September 2019, the NCLT ordered liquidation of Tag Offshore Ltd, appointing Mr. Sudip Bhattacharya as liquidator. The Plaintiff filed the suit on 20th January 2020 and obtained arrest of the vessel on the same date. Subsequent orders permitted sale of the vessel, recorded undertakings by the liquidator regarding treatment of berthing, port and salvage charges as liquidation or IRP costs under Section 53(1)(a) of the IBC, directed appointment of a crew manning agency, and eventually directed sale of the vessel. On 22nd September 2020, the Court confirmed the highest bid of J.T. Marine Services Pvt Ltd for Rs.10,75,00,000, and a Bill of Sale was issued on 29th October 2020. The break-up of the Plaintiff's claim included port charges, berth hire, penal berth hire, salvage, mooring crew, GST, interest and legal costs across three periods. Plaintiff's counsel submitted that invoices were raised from time to time, no dispute was raised, and no payment was made. Defendant No.2, the liquidator, had earlier stated that there was no dispute regarding berth and port charges and that salvage charges would be treated as liquidation costs or IRP costs subject to scrutiny of quantum. The provided judgment excerpt ends at paragraph 16 before the final operative part; therefore, the final decision and reasoning of the Court on the summary judgment application are not available in the text.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Summary Judgment - Order XIII-A read with Order XII Rule 6 of CPC - Plaintiff sought summary judgment against first defendant vessel for Rs.9,37,19,098 with interest at 18% p.a. from 18-12-2020 till payment/realization plus poundage on ground that dues were admitted and no real prospect of defending - Court recorded application and arguments; no final order in excerpt (Paras 1-2).

B) Admiralty Law - Maritime Claim - Port Charges, Berth Hire, Penal Berth Hire, Salvage, Mooring Crew, GST, Interest, Legal Costs - Vessel occupied berth from 13-02-2019 and incurred charges; vessel abandoned on 07-05-2019, drifted on 16-06-2019, necessitating salvage by TUG SHAMBHAVI; plaintiff raised invoices for these amounts - Court noted factual backdrop including insolvency of owner and subsequent sale of vessel (Paras 4-9, 15-16).

C) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Liquidation and IRP Costs - Section 53(1)(a) - Defendant No.2 as Liquidator of vessel owner undertook that costs/expenses incurred by plaintiff from 24-04-2019 till vessel leaves berth, including berthing, port and salvage charges, shall be treated as liquidation costs or IRP costs, subject to scrutiny of quantum for salvage - Court recorded this undertaking on 09-03-2020 (Paras 8, 11, 13).

D) Admiralty Law - Arrest and Court Sale of Vessel - Court Sale Procedure - Arrest of vessel ordered on 20-01-2020; sale permitted on 29-01-2020; court directed sale on 09-07-2020; highest bid of J.T. Marine Services Pvt Ltd for Rs.10,75,00,000 confirmed on 22-09-2020; Bill of Sale issued on 29-10-2020 - Court recorded these procedural developments (Paras 11-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a summary judgment against the 1st Defendant Vessel under Order XIII-A read with Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for Rs.9,37,19,098 with interest at 18% p.a. from 18-12-2020 till payment/realization plus poundage, on the ground that the claim is admitted/undisputed and the Defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending the suit.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Summary judgment under Order XIII-A CPC
  • admission of dues
  • no real prospect of defence
  • admiralty jurisdiction
  • maritime claim for port charges
  • berth hire
  • penal berth hire
  • salvage
  • mooring crew
  • GST
  • interest
  • legal costs
  • insolvency liquidation costs under Section 53(1)(a) IBC
  • court sale of arrested vessel
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (01) 73

Interim Application (L) No.112 of 2021 in Commercial Admiralty Suit (L) No.4 of 2020

2022-01-03

B. P. Colabawalla, J.

Mr.Prathamesh Kamat a/w Pooja Tidke, Krushi Barfiwala, Ryan Menedes i/b Parinam Law Associates, for the Applicant/Plaintiff; Mr. Amir Arsiwala, Mr. Dhrupad Vaghani, Ms. Naveli Reshamwalla, Mr. Ajiz M. K., Farzeen Pardiwalla, Nidhi Shah i/b Economic Law Practices, for Defendant No.2

Angre Port Private Ltd

TAG 15 (IMO. 9705550) & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Interim application for summary judgment in a commercial admiralty suit seeking recovery of port, berthing, salvage and associated charges against a vessel.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff sought summary judgment against 1st Defendant Vessel for Rs.9,37,19,098 with interest at 18% p.a. from 18-12-2020 till payment/realization plus poundage.

Filing Reason

Vessel occupied berth at plaintiff's port from 13-02-2019, incurred charges; vessel was abandoned and later salvaged; owner went into liquidation; invoices remained unpaid.

Previous Decisions

Court ordered arrest of vessel on 20-01-2020; permitted sale and joined liquidator on 29-01-2020; recorded liquidator's undertakings on 09-03-2020; directed sale on 09-07-2020; confirmed sale to J.T. Marine Services Pvt Ltd for Rs.10,75,00,000 on 22-09-2020; Bill of Sale issued 29-10-2020. NCLT earlier passed orders on 28-06-2019, 15-07-2019 and 26-09-2019 regarding resolution/liquidation.

Issues

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a summary judgment against the 1st Defendant Vessel under Order XIII-A read with Order XII Rule 6 of CPC for Rs.9,37,19,098 with interest at 18% p.a. from 18-12-2020 till payment/realization plus poundage on the ground that the claim is admitted/undisputed and the Defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending the suit.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that Defendants admitted/confirmed the dues and had no real prospect of successfully defending the claim. Plaintiff submitted that invoices were raised from time to time from 13-02-2019 onwards for berth hire, penal berth hire, port charges, salvage, mooring crew, GST, interest and legal costs, and no dispute was raised. Defendant No.2 (Liquidator) had earlier undertaken that berthing, port and salvage charges from 24-04-2019 would be treated as liquidation costs or IRP costs under Section 53(1)(a) IBC, subject to scrutiny of quantum for salvage.

Judgment Excerpts

The above Interim Application is filed under the provisions of Order XIII-A read with Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short the "CPC") seeking a summary judgment against the 1st Defendant Vessel in the sum of Rs. 9,37,19,098/- together with interest @ 18% p.a. from 18th December, 2020 till payment and/or realization plus poundage. The basic premise on which the aforesaid relief is sought is that the Defendants have not only admitted/confirmed the dues of the Applicant/Plaintiff but in any event the claim of the Applicant/Plaintiff is really undisputed, and the Defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending the claim of the Applicant/Plaintiff. This Court also recorded the undertaking and statements of Defendant No.2, who on instructions, stated that all costs/expenses incurred by the Plaintiff from 24th April 2019 till the 1st Defendant Vessel leaves the berth, including Berthing and Port charges as well as Salvage charges, shall be treated by the Liquidator as liquidation costs or IRP costs as contemplated under Section 53 (1) (a) of the IBC, 2016.

Procedural History

13-02-2019: Vessel entered Plaintiff's port and occupied berth. 04-03-2019: EXIM Bank filed Commercial Admiralty Suit (L) No.15 of 2019 against vessel and obtained arrest. 24-04-2019: Insolvency proceedings initiated against Tag Offshore Ltd by R.H. Petroleum Ltd under Section 9 IBC; Mr. Pramod Mulgund appointed IRP. 07-05-2019: Crew abandoned vessel due to unrest. 16-06-2019: Vessel drifted due to monsoon; Plaintiff deployed tug TUG SHAMBHAVI for salvage. 28-06-2019: NCLT confirmed appointment of Mr. Sudip Bhattacharya as RP. 15-07-2019: NCLT directed CoC to secure assets, take possession, proceed under Sections 51 and 52 Merchant Shipping Act, explore liquidation. 26-09-2019: NCLT ordered liquidation of Tag Offshore Ltd and confirmed Mr. Sudip Bhattacharya as liquidator. 20-01-2020: Plaintiff filed suit and obtained arrest of vessel. 28-01-2020: Defendant No.2 filed IA No.1 of 2020 seeking recall/modification of arrest; 29-01-2020 order permitted sale and joined Defendant No.2. 26-02-2020: Plaintiff filed IA No.2 of 2020 seeking sale of vessel. 09-03-2020: Court passed order recording Defendant No.2's undertakings. 30-04-2020: Court directed Defendant No.2 to appoint crew manning agency. 29-05-2020: Cyclone Nisarga developing, Plaintiff engaged mooring crew for seven days. 09-07-2020: Court directed sale of vessel. 22-09-2020: Court opened bids, confirmed sale to J.T. Marine Services Pvt Ltd for Rs.10,75,00,000. 29-10-2020: Bill of Sale issued, vessel possession taken. 20-12-2021: Judgment reserved. 03-01-2022: Judgment pronounced.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XIII-A, Order XII Rule 6
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9, Section 53(1)(a)
  • Merchant Shipping Act, 1958: Sections 51, 52
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank Employee's Petition to Withdraw Voluntary Retirement Application Under Vijaya Bank's Special VRS Scheme. The Application Was Held Irrevocable Under Clause 11.2.0 of the Scheme, and the Employee Could Not Withdraw Afte...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Employee for Assaulting Co-Worker in Canteen. Labour Court's finding of no perversity in domestic inquiry and proportionality of punishment of dismissal upheld.