Search Results for "Constructed Property Ownership"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Constructed Property Ownership"

1088 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1088 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Against BWSSB for Unauthorised Laying of Sewer Pipelines in Private Lands Without Acquisition. Petitioners Challenge Section 77 as Unconstitutional and Seek Compensation for Violation of Right to Property Under Article 300A.

1 Jun 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Society Registration and Minister's Order — Upholds Validity of Registration Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Petitioners lacked locus standi and alternative remedy was available, hence writ petitions not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by cooperative housing societies and their members challenging the registration of another cooperati...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Government Land; First Appellate Court's Dismissal of Representative Suit Challenged. The Appeal Concerns Title and Possession of 15 Guntas in Survey No.81/1, Tumkur, Originally Claimed for Government School.

1 Oct 2021

The present second appeal before the High Court of Karnataka arose from a long-standing dispute over government land in Tumkur, originally claimed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Possession. The court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as the development agreement did not grant possession.

4 Mar 2016

The appellants, Prajita Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order dated 14.01.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition by Developer Against Society in Redevelopment Dispute — Interim Injunction Granted to Protect Developer's Rights Pending Arbitration. The court held that the developer had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Sep 2023

The judgment concerns three cross-petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a dispute between a developer,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Permanent Injunction Involving Temple Dispute. Plaintiffs Sought Injunction to Restrain Interference with Possession of Temple Premises in Residential Complex.

8 Sep 2023

The appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed against the judgment and decree dated 09.09.2016 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition by MSEDCL Without Due Process — Acquisition of Land for Electricity Sub-Station Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the acquisition of land by MSEB without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is illegal and directed restoration of possession or payment of compensation.

5 Jan 2024

The petitioners, owners of land admeasuring 6685 sq.mtrs at Village Panchpakhadi, Thane, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra S...

High Court

SECOND APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2008

21 Mar 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Appoint Arbitrator in Redevelopment Dispute — Dispute Not Arbitrable Under Section 41(e) of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Termination of Development Agreement and Claim for Possession Cannot Be Referred to Arbitration as They Involve Specific Performance and Continuous Duties.

20 Oct 2015

The petitioners, Anand Villa Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Airport Appellate Tribunal Order in Eviction Proceedings under Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. Petitioner, an 85-year-old agriculturist, challenged the Tribunal's order confirming eviction from airport premises, raising issues of jurisdiction and unauthorized occupation.

30 Oct 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the order dated 10th July 2013 passed by the Chairperson of the Airport Ap...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)