High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Permanent Injunction Involving Temple Dispute. Plaintiffs Sought Injunction to Restrain Interference with Possession of Temple Premises in Residential Complex.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed against the judgment and decree dated 09.09.2016 passed by the XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S.No.2374/2012, which dismissed the suit for permanent injunction. The suit was instituted by the Sena Vihar Owners Welfare Association and Sena Vihar Temple Trust, as plaintiffs, against Sri. Bandarappa Bhakthadigala Sangha and its office bearers. The dispute concerned a Muneshwaraswamy Temple located within the Sena Vihar residential complex, Kammanahalli Main Road, Bengaluru. The plaintiffs claimed that the temple, forming part of the common areas, was jointly owned by the apartment owners and managed by the first plaintiff association. They asserted that the Army Welfare Housing Organisation had purchased land from the Bengaluru Development Authority and constructed the complex, with the temple being an integral common facility. The first plaintiff, originally a cooperative society and later a registered society, was responsible for administration. The second plaintiff, a trust created to renovate and maintain the temple, joined in the suit. The defendants allegedly intruded on 22.07.2011, attempting to take over the temple, form their own association, and carry out unauthorized renovations, causing nuisance and law and order issues. Despite police complaints, the defendants persisted. The plaintiffs sought permanent injunction to restrain interference with their possession and management. The trial court dismissed the suit, leading to the appeal. The High Court judgment text, as provided, begins with a recitation of the plaintiffs’ case and the commencement of the defendants’ written statement, but is incomplete, containing no issues framed, arguments, analysis, or decision. Therefore, the reasoning and outcome of the appeal are not available in the provided excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010190522017_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (09) 44

Regular First Appeal No.23 of 2017 (INJ)

2023-09-08

Dr. Justice H.B. Prabhakara Sastry

For Appellants: Sri. B.V. Nidhishreee; For Respondent No.3: Sri. T. Seshagiri Rao

Sena Vihar Owners Welfare Association (R) and Sena Vihar Temple Trust (R)

Sri. Bandarappa Bhakthadigala Sangha (R) and Others (Brigadier (Retd.) P.T. Monappa, Mr. Chaman K. Sehsaya, Lt. Col. (Retd.) S.K. Chakravarthy)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for permanent injunction to restrain interference with possession and enjoyment of temple property.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs (appellants) sought permanent injunction against defendants from interfering with their possession of the suit schedule temple.

Filing Reason

Defendants allegedly attempted to encroach and take over management of the temple, causing nuisance and threatening to demolish/renovate it without authority.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court (XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru) vide judgment and decree dated 09.09.2016 dismissed the suit for permanent injunction in O.S.No.2374/2012.

Judgment Excerpts

This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 09.09.2016 passed in O.S.No.2374/2012 on the file of the XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru (CCH 28), dismissing the suit for permanent injunction. the Temple in question absolutely belongs to the owners of the apartments and independent houses situated in Sena Vihar Complex and maintained, managed and administered by the plaintiffs

Procedural History

The plaintiffs (appellants) filed O.S.No.2374/2012 in the court of XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, seeking permanent injunction. The trial court dismissed the suit by judgment and decree dated 09.09.2016. The plaintiffs filed the present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of CPC before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru.

Acts & Sections

  • Societies Registration Act, 1860:
  • Army Welfare Housing Organisation Rules, 1987:
  • Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959:
  • Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960:
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96, Order XLI
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Gram Panchayat Resolutions Denying Compassionate Appointment to Widow Due to Non-Residence, Holds Government Resolution Does Not Require Village Residence. The Court ruled that the Gram Panchayat, being a State under Article...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Permanent Injunction Involving Temple Dispute. Plaintiffs Sought Injunction to Restrain Interference with Possession of Temple Premises in Residential Complex.