Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2660 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2660 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Venture Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked for disputes arising from Joint Venture Agreement dated 28th March, 2007.

The applicant, M/s. Atul & Arkade Realty, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Dispute Despite Insurer's Denial of Liability. Arbitration Clause in Comprehensive Mega Risks Insurance Policy Held to Survive Repudiation of Claim.

The applicant, Essar Steel India Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Agency Dispute — Award Declared Enforceable as Decree. Foreign Award Under Sections 46-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld as No Grounds for Refusal Under Section 48 Established.

The petitioner, Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd., a Japanese shipping company, filed a petition under Sections 46 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...