Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Dispute Despite Insurer's Denial of Liability. Arbitration Clause in Comprehensive Mega Risks Insurance Policy Held to Survive Repudiation of Claim.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 77
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Essar Steel India Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator on behalf of the respondent, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., due to the respondent's failure to nominate an arbitrator within 30 days as per the arbitration clause in the Comprehensive Mega Risks Insurance Policy. The policy covered risks including damage to property and business interruption. A dispute arose regarding a claim for damage at Essar's Chitrakonda installation. The respondent repudiated the claim, denying liability. The arbitration clause (Clause 8.12) provided for arbitration of disputes as to quantum, but excluded disputes where liability is not admitted. The respondent argued that no arbitration agreement existed because liability was denied, and alternatively, that Essar had waived its right to arbitration by engaging in correspondence and negotiations. The court analyzed the arbitration clause, noting that it specifically covers disputes as to quantum when liability is otherwise admitted, but the clause also provides for a three-arbitrator panel if the parties cannot agree on a sole arbitrator. The court held that the arbitration clause survives repudiation of the claim, as the dispute regarding quantum remains arbitrable even if liability is denied. The court also found no evidence of waiver, as Essar's participation in discussions did not amount to a clear and unequivocal waiver of its right to arbitration. The court allowed the application and appointed a sole arbitrator on behalf of the respondent.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Survival of Arbitration Clause - Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The court considered whether an arbitration clause in an insurance policy survives the insurer's repudiation of liability. Held that the arbitration clause is independent and survives repudiation, as the dispute regarding quantum remains arbitrable even if liability is denied. (Paras 1-10)

B) Arbitration Law - Waiver of Right to Arbitrate - Standard of Proof - Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The court examined whether the insured had waived its right to arbitration by participating in correspondence and negotiations. Held that waiver must be clear and unequivocal; mere participation in discussions does not constitute waiver. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an arbitration clause in an insurance policy survives the insurer's repudiation of liability, and whether the insured has waived its right to arbitration.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and appointed a sole arbitrator on behalf of the respondent.

Law Points

  • Arbitration clause survives repudiation of claim
  • waiver of arbitration rights requires clear evidence
  • Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (10) 86

Arbitration Application No. 277 of 2015

2016-10-21

S. J. Kathawalla, J.

Mr. Vikram Nankani, Senior Advocate, along with Mr. J.K. Ashar and Ms. Namrata Shah, instructed by M/s. K. Ashar & Co., for the Applicant. Mr. Venkatesh Dhond, Senior Advocate, along with Mr. Shyam Kapadia, Keanan Nagporwala and Shivani Ravat, instructed by M/s. Tuli & Co., for the Respondent.

Essar Steel India Ltd.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Essar Steel India Ltd. sought appointment of an arbitrator on behalf of The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Filing Reason

The respondent failed to nominate an arbitrator within 30 days of the applicant's nomination, as per the arbitration clause in the insurance policy.

Issues

Whether an arbitration clause in an insurance policy survives the insurer's repudiation of liability. Whether the applicant has waived its right to arbitration.

Submissions/Arguments

The respondent argued that no arbitration agreement exists because liability was denied, and the arbitration clause only applies when liability is admitted. The respondent alternatively argued that the applicant waived its right to arbitration by engaging in correspondence and negotiations. The applicant contended that the arbitration clause is independent and survives repudiation, and that there was no waiver.

Ratio Decidendi

The arbitration clause in an insurance policy survives the insurer's repudiation of liability, as the dispute regarding quantum remains arbitrable even if liability is denied. Waiver of the right to arbitration requires clear and unequivocal evidence, which was not present in this case.

Judgment Excerpts

If any dispute or difference shall arise as to the quantum to be paid under this policy (liability being otherwise admitted) such difference shall independently of all other questions be referred to the decision of a sole arbitrator... It is clearly agreed and understood that no difference or dispute shall be referable to arbitration as hereinbefore provided, if the Company has disputed or not accepted liability under or in respect of this policy.

Procedural History

The applicant filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator. The respondent opposed the application on grounds of no arbitration agreement and waiver. The court reserved judgment on 15th July 2016 and pronounced on 21st October 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Bank Against Order Returning Recovery Application for Lack of Jurisdiction. Multi-State Co-operative Bank's Recovery Application Under Section 101 of Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 Held Maintain...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Dispute Despite Insurer's Denial of Liability. Arbitration Clause in Comprehensive Mega Risks Insurance Policy Held to Survive Repudiation of Claim.