Search Results for "compensation exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "compensation exemption"

444 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 444 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court's Review Order in Mutation Dispute — Review Power Cannot Be Used to Rehear Merits After Dismissal of SLP. The High Court's review order was set aside as it sought to re-examine the merits after the Supreme Court had dismissed the SLP against the original judgment, and the contempt petition was barred by limitation.

1 Jan 2024

The present appeals arise from a long-standing property dispute concerning land known as 'Asman Jahi Paigah' in Raidurg village. The original suit for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

20 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 Are Impugned.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

KAHC010023912010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can File Consumer Complaint Jointly with Assured.

9 Aug 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing the hotel's appeal against an order of the State Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

6 Mar 2025

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Challenging Penalties Imposed by Government Company under Fuel Supply Agreement. The Court Determines that Government Company is 'State' Under Article 12, Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction, but Leaves Final Decision on Contractual Dispute Adjudication Open.

19 Sep 2023

The writ petition was filed by two joint venture companies, Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Ltd. and EMTA Coal Limited, challenging a demand letter dated 12...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging FEMA Adjudication Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Petitioners' challenge to show cause notices and adjudication orders under FEMA fails as writ petitions are not maintainable against mere show cause notices and are barred by delay and laches.

19 Nov 2022

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging show cause notices and adjudication order...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit Under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962. Assessee Claims That Requirement to Deposit 7.5% of Duty Demanded, Capped at Rs.10 Crores, Renders Appellate Remedy Illusory and Infringes Fundamental Rights to Trade and Livelihood.

7 Nov 2025

The petitioner, an importer of edible oils, challenged the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 before th...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)