KAHC010408942020_1
6 Sep 2022The writ petition was filed by the management of a company engaged in the manufacture of industrial carbon and carbon brushes, classified as a hazardo...
Search Results for "Section 133 Indian Contract Act"
395 result(s) found
Found 395 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.
1 Jan 1970These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Admiralty Suit for Vessel Arrest and Collision Damages Involving Two Vessels at Marmugao Port. The Court was seized of a claim for damages of Rs.13,33,70,000 arising from alleged negligent collision and a counter claim seeking limitation of liability under Merchant's Shipping Act, 1958.
17 Jul 2025The matter was an admiralty suit filed in the Bombay High Court's Admiralty and Vice Admiralty jurisdiction by V.M. Salgaocar and Bro. Ltd., owner of ...
High Court
- 94
High Court
- 46
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.
8 Jun 2026These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...
- 93
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 84
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....
- 64
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.
1 Jan 1970This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...
- 91
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 98
