High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "Rule 222"
660 result(s) found
Found 660 result(s)
High Court
- 45
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Probate Granted to Executors of Will — Will Proved in Manner Required by Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872
8 Aug 2014The appeal arose from a probate proceeding concerning the Will of Purvez Burjor Dalal, a Parsi who died on 7th December 2011. The appellant, Manek Dar...
- 194
High Court
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.
20 Sep 2024The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...
- 832
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Orders Central Empowered Committee to Identify Mining Leases Operating in Violation of Environmental and Forest Laws in Odisha. Court Finds Prima Facie Case of Illegal Mining and Directs Preparation of List of Defaulting Lessees for Interim Relief Under Article 32.
1 Aug 2026The writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were filed by Common Cause and Prafulla Samantra, alleging rampant illegal mining in the Keonj...
- 43
High Court
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act, 1956 for Lack of Personal Hearing. Compensation Determination Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 3G(2) Requiring Hearing Before Fixing Amount.
30 Mar 2019The petitioners, owners of land in Nagpur, challenged the acquisition of their land for the construction of a national highway under the National High...
- 107
High Court
- 67
