High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 issued by the State of Karnataka under Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, and published in the Official Gazette on 27.08.2008. The lead petition, W.P. No.2642/2009, was filed by National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (NMDC Ltd.), a government company, seeking a declaration that the notification was ultra vires Article 246 read with Entry 54 of the Union List, the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, and the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Other petitioners included Vedanta Limited (formerly Sesa Goa Limited), individual mining lessees, the Federation of Indian Mineral Industries, and other private mining companies. They also challenged demand notices issued by the Deputy Conservator of Forests demanding payment of Forest Development Tax under the impugned notification. The State Government defended the levy as a valid exercise of its legislative competence. The petitions were consolidated and heard together. The judgment was reserved and delivered on 03.12.2015 by a division bench comprising the Acting Chief Justice and Justice B.V. Nagarathna. The full text of the judgment is not available in the provided excerpt; consequently, the court’s reasoning, ratio decidendi, and final decision cannot be determined.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notification dated 16.08.2008 issued under Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, levying Forest Development Tax on mining leases in forest areas, is ultra vires the Constitution of India, 1950 and the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; and whether Section 98A applies to Central Government corporations.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (12) 15

Writ Petition Nos.2642/2009 (GM-MM-S) c/w 44793/2013, 13595/2008, 13516/2008, 13654/2008, 13803/2008, 14157/2008, 14802/2008, 30927/2008, 30928/2008, 30995/2008, 31128/2008, 31129/2008, 31141/2008, 31142/2008, 31143/2008, 31144/2008, 31145/2008, 31146/2008, 31147/2008, 31148/2008, 31149/2008, 31152/2008, 31181/2008, 31183/2008, 31184/2008, 31185/2008, 31188/2008, 31189/2008, 31191/2008, 31227/2008, 31228/2008, 31229/2008, 31230/2008, 31234/2008, 31235/2008, 31266/2008, 31327/2008, 31439/2008, 31577/2008, 368/2009, 863/2009, 6721/2009, 10712/2009, 16237/2009, 35251/2009, 60230/2009, 15782/2010, 15795/2010, 15809/2010, 15825-15826/2010, 15953/2010, 15954/2010, 15984/2010, 15985/2010, 15990/2010, 15991/2010, 16145/2010, 16144/2010, 16147/2010, 17000/2010, 17001/2010, 17002/2010, 17087/2010, 17455/2010, 17580/2010, 17581/2010, 17582/2010, 17583/2010, 18500/2010, 18952/2010, 20215/2010, 23901/2010, 29222/2010, 32095/2010, 37208/2010, 37209/2010, 37210/2010, 39190/2010, 9960/2010, 15431/2010, 15432/2010, 545/2011, 2776/2011, 7337/2011, 13023/2011, 15686/2011, 15687/2011, 15689/2011, 15691/2011, 15692/2011, 15693/2011, 31233/2008, 31182/2008, 31184/2008 and 31185/2008 (GM-MM-S)

2015-12-03

Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, B.V. Nagarathna

K. Raghavacharyulu, D.R. Ravishankar, Udaya Holla, K.N. Phanindra, D.L.N. Rao, S.R. Anuradha, L.M. Chidanandayya, K.N. Srinivasa, Prof. Ravivarma Kumar, A.S. Ponnanna, Y.H. Vijay Kumar

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (now NMDC Ltd.), Vedanta Limited (formerly Sesa Goa Limited), Sri R. Praveenchandra, Federation of Indian Mineral Industries, M/s Mineral Enterprise Limited, M/s Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports, M/s MSPL Limited, M/s Ramghad Minerals & Mining Pvt. Ltd., M/s P. Venganna Setty & Bros., Banashankari Iron Ore Mines, Raja Mahal Group Export and Import of Minerals, M/s Canara Minerals Private Limited, The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd., Sri Allam Veerabhadrappa, M/s Bharat Mines & Minerals, M/s V.S. Lad & Sons, and others

State of Karnataka through its Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Ecology and Environment; The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests; The Conservator of Forests; The Deputy Conservator of Forests; The Director of Mines and Geology

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Constitutional challenge to a notification levying Forest Development Tax on mining leases in notified forest areas under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the Notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand notices, and a declaration that Section 98A does not apply to Central Government corporations.

Filing Reason

Allegation that the State lacked legislative competence to impose such tax and the notification contravened the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

Issues

Whether Notification dated 16.08.2008 issued under Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 is ultra vires the Constitution of India and the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Whether Section 98A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 applies to Central Government corporations and trading companies like NMDC and STC. Whether the State Government can demand and collect Forest Development Tax from mining leaseholders operating within forest areas.

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions were filed between 2008 and 2013 before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the same notification and demand notices. The matters were consolidated and heard together by a division bench. The judgment was reserved and delivered on 03.12.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Forest Act, 1963: 98A
  • Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980: Not specified
  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, Articles 226, 227
  • Companies Act, 1956: Not specified
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.
Related Judgement
High Court KAHC010479002008_1