Search Results for "minor prosecutrix"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC — Conviction Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(f) Challenged

This appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 363, 366A and 376(2)(f) of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conviction Under Indian Penal Code and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Upheld – DNA Evidence Confirmed Biological Parentage

Conviction and Sentence Confirmed – Consent Obtained Under Misconception of Fact – Victim Below Eighteen Years of Age (a) Consent of Minor Irrele...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against Accused Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case and False Implication. Allegations of Sexual Assault on Minor Found Baseless as Medical Evidence and Conduct of Complainant Contradicted FIR.

The petitioner, Krishnappa, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of proceedings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Ajay Keshav @ Kiran Malekar for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Sections 376, 452, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vijay Ramrao Mohod, was convicted by the 2nd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No.14/2005 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Cancellation of Bail in POCSO Case — No Supervening Circumstances or Misconduct Established. Court held that cancellation of bail requires proof of misuse of liberty or supervening circumstances, not mere disagreement with the bail order.

The applicant, a minor victim through her natural guardian, filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking...