Search Results for "cooperative society redevelopment"

262 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application in Development Agreement Dispute Due to Novation Extinguishing Arbitration Clause. Deed of Novation Substituted Original Agreement Without Arbitration Clause, No Prima Facie Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Applicant and Respondents.

The applicant, M/s. Mukesh Patel and Ors., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.

The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2019

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Development Agreement Dispute, Holding Claim Time-Barred. Court Refuses to Condon 15-Day Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963, Relying on HPCL Bio-Fuels and Emphasizing Need for Exceptional Circumstances.

The dispute arose from a Development Agreement dated March 31, 2016 between the applicant-developer and the respondent-cooperative housing society for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation on Encroachments on Public Utility Land in Nagpur. Petition Treated as PIL and Notice Issued to Authorities for Removal of Encroachments on Reserved Lands.

The matter involves a public interest litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by social workers Madhukar Sampatr...