Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application in Development Agreement Dispute Due to Novation Extinguishing Arbitration Clause. Deed of Novation Substituted Original Agreement Without Arbitration Clause, No Prima Facie Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Applicant and Respondents.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 47
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, M/s. Mukesh Patel and Ors., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a Development Agreement dated 1st October 2012 entered into between the applicant and Respondent No. 1 (Pant Nagar Ganesh Krupa Cooperative Housing Society Limited). The Development Agreement contained an arbitration clause. Subsequently, a Deed of Novation dated 1st October 2013 was executed among the applicant, Respondent No. 1, and Respondent No. 2 (Avvad Spaces LLP), whereby Respondent No. 2 was substituted in place of the applicant as the developer. The Deed of Novation did not contain an arbitration clause. The applicant contended that the arbitration clause from the original agreement survived the novation and that disputes with Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3 (Shubham Ambience Co-Operative Housing Society Limited) should be referred to arbitration. The respondents opposed the application, arguing that the novation extinguished the original agreement and its arbitration clause, and that there was no arbitration agreement between the applicant and Respondent No. 2 or Respondent No. 3. The court, after examining the documents, held that the Deed of Novation substituted a new contract, extinguishing the original agreement and its arbitration clause. The court further held that there was no prima facie arbitration agreement between the applicant and Respondent No. 2 or Respondent No. 3, as they were not parties to the original arbitration agreement. The court dismissed the application, finding no merit in the applicant's contentions.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The court must confine itself to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement. If the original agreement containing the arbitration clause is novated by a subsequent deed that does not contain an arbitration clause, the arbitration clause is extinguished. (Paras 1-10)

B) Contract Law - Novation - Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 - A deed of novation substitutes a new contract for the old one, extinguishing the original contract and all its terms, including an arbitration clause. The new contract must be examined for the existence of an arbitration agreement. (Paras 11-15)

C) Arbitration Law - Parties to Arbitration Agreement - Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - An arbitration agreement must be in writing and signed by the parties. A party who is not a signatory to the arbitration agreement cannot be compelled to arbitrate. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the arbitration application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is maintainable when the original agreement containing the arbitration clause has been novated by a subsequent deed that does not contain an arbitration clause, and whether there exists a prima facie arbitration agreement between the applicant and the respondents.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the Commercial Arbitration Application No. 389 of 2024, holding that there was no prima facie arbitration agreement between the applicant and the respondents, and the application was not maintainable.

Law Points

  • Arbitration agreement
  • Deed of novation
  • Extinguishment of arbitration clause
  • Prima facie existence of arbitration agreement
  • Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act
  • 1872
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 29

Commercial Arbitration Application No. 389 of 2024

2025-10-09

SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w. Mr. Vikram Garewal, Mr. Aditya Miskita, Mr. Devansh Bheda, Mr. Parth Jasani, Mr. Kartikeya Awasthi i/b M/s. Purnanand & Co., for Applicant. Mr. Dinyar Madon, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Ziad Madon and Mr. Shubro Dey, for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir, Senior Advocate a/w. Roop Basu and Heenal Wadhwa i/b The Law Point, for Respondent No. 3.

M/s. Mukesh Patel and Ors.

Pant Nagar Ganesh Krupa Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Avvad Spaces LLP, Shubham Ambience Co-Operative Housing Society Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial arbitration application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a Development Agreement dated 1st October 2012.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the applicant and the respondents regarding the Development Agreement, and the applicant invoked the arbitration clause contained therein.

Issues

Whether the arbitration clause in the original Development Agreement survived the Deed of Novation dated 1st October 2013. Whether there exists a prima facie arbitration agreement between the applicant and Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3. Whether the arbitration application under Section 11 is maintainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the arbitration clause in the original Development Agreement survived the novation and that disputes with all respondents should be referred to arbitration. Respondent No. 2 argued that the Deed of Novation extinguished the original agreement and its arbitration clause, and there was no arbitration agreement between the applicant and Respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 3 argued that it was not a party to any arbitration agreement with the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

A deed of novation extinguishes the original contract and all its terms, including an arbitration clause. Under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court must confine itself to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement. If the arbitration agreement does not exist between the parties, the court cannot appoint an arbitrator.

Judgment Excerpts

The Deed of Novation dated 1st October 2013 substituted Respondent No. 2 in place of the applicant as the developer, extinguishing the original Development Agreement and its arbitration clause. There is no prima facie arbitration agreement between the applicant and Respondent No. 2 or Respondent No. 3. The application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is dismissed.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Commercial Arbitration Application No. 389 of 2024 under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The respondents filed their replies opposing the application. The court heard the parties and delivered the judgment on 9th October 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11, Section 11(6A), Section 7, Section 8
  • Indian Contract Act, 1872: Section 62
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application in Development Agreement Dispute Due to Novation Extinguishing Arbitration Clause. Deed of Novation Substituted Original Agreement Without Arbitration Clause, No Prima Facie Arbitration Agreement Ex...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Tribunal's Award Modified for Future Loss of Income and Pain & Suffering. Claimant, a labourer aged 40, sustained grievous injuries in a truck accident; court...