Search Results for "Contract Basis"

6351 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6351 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Waste Management Contract Dispute — Petitioner Granted Protection Against Termination and Bank Guarantee Invocation Pending Arbitration.

The petitioner, PMP Infratech Pvt Ltd, an AA Class Government Registered Civil Contractor, was engaged by the respondent, Bharat Petro Resources Ltd (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition by State-Owned Oil Corporation to Set Aside Arbitral Award. Petitioner Alleges That Award Is Vitiated by Fraud Due to Non-Disclosure of Corporate Insolvency Proceedings by Respondent Joint Venture.

The matter arose out of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 1723 OF 2020

The dispute arose from a tender floated by respondent no.1 MIHAN India Ltd. for up-gradation, modernization, operation and management of Dr. Babasaheb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction Bank Guarantee Encashment in Commercial Dispute. No Case of Fraud or Irretrievable Injustice Made Out to Restrain Bank Guarantee Invocation Under Contract Law Principles.

The appeal arises from an order of the learned Single Judge refusing to grant an injunction restraining the respondent from encashing a bank guarantee...