Search Results for "water tender"

586 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Notification Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld as Valid and for Public Purpose.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by shop owners and residents of Byadagi town, Haveri district, challenging the land acquisition proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Contract Dispute — Remands Case for Fresh Consideration of Counterclaim Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Lead Evidence on Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 6A CPC Warrants Remand.

The appellant, Executive Engineer of Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, filed a suit for damages of Rs. 17,28,855.65 against the respondent, Kat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Contract Dispute — Remands for Fresh Trial Due to Improper Issue Framing. Trial court's failure to frame proper issues and appreciate evidence regarding delay in construction contract warrants remand for fresh adjudication of suit and counterclaim.

The present first appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 8th March 2000 passed by the learned Second Joint Civil Judge (SD), Kachchh at Bhuj, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiffs in Leave and License Dispute — Defendant's Unconditional Appearance Precludes Leave to Defend. The Court held that the Defendant failed to raise any triable issues and was not entitled to leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

The Plaintiffs, M/s. Mangla International Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a Summary Suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Banning Order Issued by Public Sector Undertaking – Allegations of Blacklisting Without Proper Notice and Violation of Fundamental Rights. Petitioner Contends That Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Intention to Ban for Three Years, Rendering Order Arbitrary.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a private limited company engaged in corrosion resistant coating applica...