Search Results for "Share Valuation"

543 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 543 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Filed by Builder Challenging Sealing of Property Under Enemy Property Act, 1968. Court Examines Legality of Order Passed by Deputy Secretary and Custodian After Earlier Withdrawal of Enemy Property Proceedings.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged as builder and developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010872812010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC fails as no substantial question of law arises from concurrent findings of courts below regarding declaration of title and injunction.

The appellant, Maruti A/F Laxman Patil, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal by Divided Son in Hindu Joint Family Property Dispute. Son who separated from father prior to 1956 is entitled to share in ancestral property as per Mitakshara law and Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves two regular first appeals (RFA No.100007/2014 and RFA No.100028/2014) arising from a common judgment and decree dated 25.10.2013 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Stamp Duty Adjudication Case — Holds Adjudication Under Section 31 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Final and Binding. Reopening of Adjudication After 20 Years Under Section 53A Is Without Jurisdiction and Barred by Delay.

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...