Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

KAHC010872812010_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU

Admin

2026-08-03 02:28:42

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010872812010_1

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (06) 20

R.F.A. No. 2116 of 2010 c/w R.F.A. No. 2117 of 2010

2013-06-06

N. Kumar, B Sreenivase Gowda

Y. R. Sadashiva Reddy for appellants; O. Shivarama Bhat, M. Narayana Reddy, V. Lakshminarayana, C. Gowrishankar, G. Chandrashekaraiah, H. S. Satish Kumar, B. L. Nandakumar Associates, M. C. Narasimhan Associates, Srinivasa Raghavan for respondents

Smt Ramakka, Purushotham, Ravi, Bhagyamma, Hemavathi, Lalithamma, Yashodamma, Smt Geetha

Smt Thanamma (since deceased by LRs) and others

Nature of Litigation

Suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural land, garden land, and grape vine yard

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs sought partition and separate possession of ancestral properties; defendants/appellants appealed against the decree granting shares

Filing Reason

Plaintiffs claimed to be members of a Hindu Undivided Family and alleged they were denied their shares in ancestral properties

Previous Decisions

The trial court (I Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore) partly decreed the suits for partition and separate possession on 2010-10-18

Judgment Excerpts

These two appeals are preferred against the common judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.2640/1988 and O.S. No. 5075/2000 decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs. The case of the plaintiffs is, one Arasikuttappa is the propositor. He had two sons by name Chinnanna and Muniyellappa. Muniyellappa had two wives, Smt. Pillamma – the first defendant and Smt. Thanamma – the first plaintiff.

Procedural History

The plaintiffs filed O.S.No.2640/1988 and O.S.No.5075/2000 before the I Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore, seeking partition and separate possession. The trial court passed a common judgment and decree on 2010-10-18 partly decreeing the suits. The defendants/appellants filed Regular First Appeals under Section 96 CPC before the High Court of Karnataka. The High Court heard the appeals and delivered judgment on 2013-06-06.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 96
Hindu Succession Act, 1956:

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)

KAHC010872812010_1

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Filing Reason

Previous Decisions

Judgment Excerpts

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...