High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "Section 2(14)"
823 result(s) found
Found 823 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Orders in Section 9 Applications for Injunction in Water Supply Project Dispute. Court Examines Whether Injunction Preventing Contract Termination Amounts to Impermissible Specific Performance Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.
24 Oct 2016The matter involved two arbitration appeals arising from interim applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispu...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Petitioner's Long Possession as Tenant Does Not Bar Restoration.
2 Feb 2015The petitioner, Hirakant Ramchandra Kothari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: one dated 23...
- 132
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.
1 Jan 1970The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Passes Interim Orders to Curb Illegal Mining in Odisha and Directs Central Empowered Committee to Identify Violating Lessees. Mining Operations Require Mandatory Clearances Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Non-Compliance Renders Operations Illegal and Subject to Immediate Intervention Under Article 32.
1 Aug 2026Two writ petitions were filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by Common Cause and by Prafulla Samantra and Anr. against the Union of India and ot...
- 78
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.
1 Oct 2024The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...
- 371
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MSME Arbitration Execution Dispute, Upholding High Court's Ruling on Nullity Plea and Jurisdiction. Arbitral Award Remains Executable Despite Insolvency Resolution Plan Approving Claim at Nil, as Facilitation Council's Jurisdiction Not Extinguished Under Section 31 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
21 Apr 2025The appeal arose from a dispute under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSME Act), where the respondent filed claim petit...
- 470
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Report Against Retired Revenue Inspector for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Initiation of Departmental Proceedings Set Aside as Allegations of Misappropriation of Government Land Were Not Substantiated by Material on Record.
23 Oct 2025The petitioner, Sri N. Hanumantha, a retired Sheristedar (formerly Revenue Inspector) in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Mandya, filed a writ p...
- 238
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Removal of Waterman for Violation of Natural Justice — Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid as Enquiry Officer Not Appointed Under Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the entire disciplinary proceedings were vitiated due to lack of jurisdiction of the enquiry officer, and directed reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages.
21 Oct 2020The petitioner, S.K. Shankarappa, was appointed as a Waterman in Shettikere Gram Panchayath on 02.04.1998 and later assigned additional work as Bill C...
- 131
