Search Results for "Bombay Town Planning Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Bombay Town Planning Act"

1134 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1134 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Declares Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. Non-acquisition of Reserved Land Within Ten Years from Development Plan Coming into Force and Further Twelve Months After Purchase Notice Triggers Automatic Lapsing Under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

29 Mar 2019

The dispute arose from the reservation of the petitioners' land in Solapur under the Development Plan 1997-2017 for a Children's Play Ground. The Deve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Notice of Motion in MOFA-MMRDA Dispute. Flat Purchasers Claimed MOFA Rights on Land Owned by MMRDA and Leased to Developer, Which Respondents Disputed as Excluded Under MMRDA Act.

17 Mar 2022

This appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from the dismissal of a Notice of Motion by a learned Single Judge in a suit concerning a plot of land ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Right Certificate Issued to Developer. Court holds that issuance of DRC under MRTP Act was valid and no loss to public exchequer was caused.

8 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Mr. Manoj Jaswantlal Kapadia, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the issuance of a Developmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Union of India for Mandatory Army NOC near Colaba Military Station — Security Concerns Over Adarsh Building Construction. The petition sought demolition of the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society building for lack of security clearance from the Defence Department as required for constructions near military installations.

29 Apr 2016

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the Union of India through the Indian Army seeking a mandamus to restrain the St...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction on Gaothan Land — Upholds Municipal Action Under MRTP Act. Held that construction without valid permission is liable for demolition without prior notice.

29 Apr 2023

The petitioners, Jamshid Kersi Dalal and others, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their building constructed on gaothan land in Pun...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Sanction Variation of Town Planning Scheme. State Government's Refusal to Delete Internal Road Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant trust. The trust challenged an order dated...

High Court

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Considers Whether Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act Lapses Acquisitions Under MRTP Act — Reference to Determine Interplay Between Central and State Land Acquisition Laws. The core issue was whether acquisition proceedings initiated under Sections 125-127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 fall within the lapsing provision of the 2013 Central Act.

13 Oct 2017

The matter before the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired under the prov...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Writ Petition Concerning Lapsing of Land Reservation. Petitioners Claim Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Was Not Acted Upon by Authorities, Leading to Relief Sought.

13 Jun 2025

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking a declaration that the reservation o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

17 Nov 2022

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)