Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Union of India for Mandatory Army NOC near Colaba Military Station — Security Concerns Over Adarsh Building Construction. The petition sought demolition of the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society building for lack of security clearance from the Defence Department as required for constructions near military installations.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the Union of India through the Indian Army seeking a mandamus to restrain the State of Maharashtra, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, and the MMRDA from granting any building or development permissions in the vicinity of the Colaba Military Station without a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Army authorities. The petition also sought demolition of the building constructed by the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society on a plot near the military station, alleging that the construction was carried out without the mandatory security clearance from the Defence Department. The dispute arose from the allotment of a plot of land in Block VI of Colaba Division to the Adarsh Society for a residential building for serving and retired defence personnel. The Army had initially communicated in 2000 that the land fell outside the defence boundary and had no objection to the allotment for welfare purposes. However, subsequently, the MMRDA in 2005 required the society's architects to obtain a specific NOC from the Defence Department (Navy) from a security viewpoint, given the plot's proximity to the Navy Nagar area and the proposed height of the building. The society enclosed the earlier letters of 2000 as the NOC, which the petitioner contended were not valid security clearances. The petitioner argued that the letters merely confirmed the land status and did not address security concerns, and that the absence of a proper NOC posed a security risk to sensitive military and naval installations in the vicinity, including the TIFR. The society maintained that the earlier communications amounted to a valid NOC and that other high-rise buildings existed in the area, obviating the need for a special clearance. The court heard extensive arguments from both sides and reserved its judgment on 2 December 2015, pronouncing it on 29 April 2016. The full text of the judgment beyond paragraph 11 was not provided in the excerpt, and therefore the final decision and operative directions of the court could not be determined.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The Union of India through the Indian Army invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of the High Court seeking mandamus to prevent the State and municipal authorities from granting building permissions near the Colaba Military Station without an No Objection Certificate from the Army, and to demolish the Adarsh building constructed on a plot adjacent to the military area, alleging serious security implications. (Paras 1-3)

B) Land and Development Law - Allotment of Government Land - No Objection Certificate (NOC) - The Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society obtained a letter of intent for allotment of a plot in Block VI of Colaba Division, which was previously in possession of the Army; however, the Army's communication of 5 April 2000 merely confirmed that the land fell outside the defence boundary and did not constitute a security clearance NOC as required by the MMRDA in 2005. (Paras 4-6, 10-11)

C) Municipal Law - Building Permissions - Security Clearance - The MMRDA in 2005 required the architects of the Adarsh Society to obtain a NOC from the Defence Department (Navy) from a security viewpoint due to the plot’s proximity to a defence area; the society submitted letters from 2000 which did not fulfil this requirement. (Paras 9-11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents can be restrained from granting development permissions near Colaba Military Station without a No Objection Certificate from Army Authorities. Whether the Adarsh Building was constructed without valid security NOC and therefore liable to be demolished.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Requirement of No Objection Certificate from Defence Authorities for constructions near military areas
  • Security implications of high-rise buildings near sensitive installations
  • Scope of writ of mandamus under Article 226
  • Distinction between NOC for land allotment and security clearance
  • Compliance with conditions of building permission
  • Demolition of unauthorized construction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (04) 77

Writ Petition No. 452 of 2012

2016-04-29

Ranjit More, R.G. Ketkar

Daraius J. Khambata, M.I. Sethna, Dhiren Shah, A.M. Sethna, Phiroz Mehta, Anket U Nikam, R. Thakkar (for Petitioner); Shailesh Shah, B.H. Mehta (for Respondent 1); Kiran Bagalia (for Respondent 3); Navroz Seervai, Manish Desai, Saket Mone, Vishesh Kalra, S. Chakraborti (for Respondent 4)

The Union of India, through the Indian Army, HQ, MG&G Area, through the GOC, MG&G Area

State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Urban Development Department and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of mandamus to restrain granting of building permissions without Army No Objection Certificate near Colaba Military Station and to demolish Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society building.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 not to grant any development permissions, Completion Certificate or Occupation Certificate in respect of Adarsh building without NOC from Army Authorities, and to demolish the building.

Filing Reason

Alleged that the Adarsh building was constructed on a plot near the Colaba Military Station without obtaining mandatory security clearance from the Defence Department, posing security risks.

Previous Decisions

Administrative Order dated 25.8.2015 by the Honourable Chief Justice reconstituted this Special Bench for hearing of the petition and connected matters.

Issues

Whether the respondents can be restrained from granting any building/development permissions in the vicinity of Colaba Military Station without a No Objection Certificate from Army Authorities. Whether the Adarsh Building was constructed without obtaining valid security clearance NOC from the Defence Department and is therefore liable to be demolished.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the letters dated 30.3.2000 and 5.4.2000 relied upon by the society were not No Objection Certificates from a security viewpoint; they only confirmed that the land was outside the defence boundary and the Army had no objection to allotment for welfare of service personnel. Petitioner contended that MMRDA's letter dated 11.7.2005 required a NOC from the Defence Department (Navy) from a security perspective, which was not obtained, and the letters from 2000 were insufficient. Petitioner highlighted security implications of a high-rise building near Army and Navy areas and sensitive installations like TIFR. Respondent 4 society claimed that the letter of 5.4.2000 amounted to a NOC from the Defence Department, and that there were already high-rise buildings in the vicinity.

Judgment Excerpts

The plot under reference is very close to the Defence area known as Navy Nagar and the proposed height of the building is 54.9 meters. Hence, the clearance from the Defence Department (Navy Department) be obtained from security point of view and the same is not submitted. The plot falls in the block VI of Colaba Division, where Defence Department owns no land. There are already high rise buildings in the vicinity like IDBI towers, World Trade Centre etc in the light of this NOC from Defence Authorities should not be insisted upon. However, the NOC from Defence Department is enclosed as desired by you. The alleged NOC in question was only qua allotment of Adarsh plot and was not from a security point of view. The GOC, M&G Area Maj. Gen. B.A.Cariappa inaugurated an ecopark here on 27.10.1996 on the Infantry Day. The park is surrounded by Military Engineering Service and the same is adjacent and contiguous to Army Unit.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Article 226. By Administrative Order dated 25.8.2015, the Special Bench was reconstituted by the Chief Justice to hear the petition and connected matters. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith; after hearing arguments from both sides, the court reserved judgment on 2.12.2015 and pronounced it on 29.04.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Union of India for Mandatory Army NOC near Colaba Military Station — Security Concerns Over Adarsh Building Construction. The petition sought demolition of the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society building for ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Where Accused Alleged False Implication and Consent. The Court Examined Whether Absence of Bodily Injuries Was Fatal to Prosecution Case Given Corroborating Medical Evidence of F...