Search Results for "valuation and court fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "valuation and court fee"

277 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 277 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State Bank of India in Jet Airways Insolvency Case — Holds Performance Bank Guarantee Cannot Be Adjusted Against Resolution Plan Payment and Non-Implementation Leads to Liquidation. The Court ruled that the SRA's failure to pay airport dues and employee dues constituted non-implementation of the Resolution Plan under Section 33(3) IBC, 2016, and the PBG cannot be set off against the first tranche payment.

13 Nov 2024

The case pertains to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways (India) Limited, initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Appellate Court's Order Directing Deposit of Fair Market Rent as Pre-condition for Stay of Eviction Decree in License Case. The court held that the principle of Atma Ram Properties applies to licensees but the Appellate Court cannot split the period of unlawful occupation; the licensee must deposit contractual compensation from termination of license till disposal of appeal.

27 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Safset Agencies Private Ltd., a company dealing in art, was a licensee under a Leave and Licence Agreement dated 25 September 2006 wit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Trademark Infringement Suit — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Granting Leave to File Additional Written Statement. The court held that inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be used to bypass specific procedural provisions, and allowing additional written statement after framing of issues would cause prejudice to the plaintiff.

7 Jun 2024

The petitioner, M/s BTV Kannada Private Limited, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC read with Article 215 of the Constitution of In...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Returning Plaint for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Suit for Injunction and Damages. The Court Held That for Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Only Plaint Averments Are Relevant, Not Evidence.

5 Aug 2022

The appellant, Bharat Bhushan Gupta, filed a suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction and recovery of damages against the respondents, Pratap Nar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Fee Regulatory Committee's Determination in Telangana Professional College Fee Dispute. Court Sets Aside High Court's Re-determination of Fees for B.E./B.Tech Courses for Block Period 2016-2019, Upholding Expert Committee's Uniform Fee of Rs.97,000 per Student.

1 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a dispute over the fixation of fee structure for B.E. and B.Tech courses in private unaided professi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

2 Aug 2017

The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Property Suit — Valuation Based on Market Value Determines Forum. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Over Non-Agricultural Property Must Be Valued Under Section 6 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959; Plaintiffs Directed to Pay Deficit Court Fees.

13 Apr 2015

The case involves a challenge to an order dated 28 October 2014 passed by the 16th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune, which held that the court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Plaint Ordered to be Returned for Presentation to Proper Court Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the City Civil Court at Dindoshi lacked jurisdiction over immovable property situated in Kandivali, and the plaint must be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

10 Oct 2011

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant no. 4, Manju Narendra Gupta, challenging an order of the City Civil Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Partition Suit Valuation Dispute — Court Fee Payable Under Section 6(iv)(d) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 on Market Value of Plaintiff's Share. Suit for partition and possession of agricultural land valued at Rs.4,60,000/- held to be properly valued under Section 6(iv)(d) and not under Section 6(iv)(ha) of the Act.

29 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Sau. Asha Sopan Maithane, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 02.09.2009 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kha...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)