Search Results for "rectification proceedings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "rectification proceedings"

278 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 278 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Service Tax Demand on Road Construction Contracts for Government Departments. Notification No. 25/2012-ST Exempts Construction of Roads for Government from Service Tax Under Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

14 Nov 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Suman Construction, a government-registered civil contractor, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order Dismissing ROM Application as Time-Barred. Time Limit Under Section 129B(2) of Customs Act, 1962 Applies Only to Suo Moto Rectification, Not to Applications Filed by Parties.

10 Jul 2017

The appellant, M/s. Allied Fibers Ltd., imported capital goods between October 1994 and September 1995. A show cause notice was issued on 24.03.1998 d...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark for Non-Use and Discrepancy in User Date — Ayyappan Brand Registration Expunged. The court held that failure to prove use of the mark as registered and unexplained discrepancy in user date warrant removal under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s.Sree Lakshmi Balaji Industries, filed a petition under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking removal/rect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Appeal Dismissed for Non-Prosecution by ITAT — Rule 24 of ITAT Rules Does Not Confer Power to Dismiss Appeal for Default in Absence of Notice of Hearing. The Court Held That the Tribunal Must Hear the Appellant Before Dismissing the Appeal and Has Inherent Power to Restore It.

23 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case — Interim Protection Extended Pending Regular Bail Application. Court holds that custodial interrogation is not required when the accused is willing to cooperate and the offence is bailable in nature under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

25 Nov 2025

The judgment pertains to two applications for anticipatory bail filed by Shyamsundar Radhyesham Agarwal and Balwant Kashinath Patil in connection with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Excess Material Consumption Claim Upheld, Defective Work Claim Set Aside. Court Interprets Contractual Wastage Allowances and Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Excess Consumption Are Not Perverse, But Award for Defective Work Lacks Evidence.

2 Sep 2014

The petitioner, New Consolidated Construction Co. Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 16th September 2013 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Against University for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Personal Hearing Renders Order Illegal Under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Circulars Mandating Personal Hearing Before Adverse Order Are Binding on Adjudicating Authority.

27 Apr 2026

The University of Mumbai, established under the Bombay University Act, 1953 and later governed by the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, filed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Development Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Slum Rehabilitation Authority. Court holds that developer's unilateral action of obtaining SRA approval for redevelopment on petitioner's plot without consent does not warrant interim relief under Section 9 of Arbitration Act as the agreement contained arbitration clause and petitioner failed to show irreparable injury.

4 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Jai Neptune Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ITAT's Rectification Order in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 254(2) by Reviewing Its Own Decision. Mistake Apparent from Record Must Be Obvious and Not Require Re-appreciation of Evidence.

23 Sep 2023

The petitioner, M/s. I.G. Petrochemicals Ltd., an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 05.09.202...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)