Search Results for "premature petition"

829 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 829 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Remission Policy Applicability Case — 2002 Policy Governs Convicts Sentenced Before 2008 Policy Came Into Effect. The Court held that the policy in force at the time of conviction applies, and subsequent policy cannot be applied retrospectively to deny remission.

The appellant, Parveen Kumar @ Parveen Chauhan, was convicted for the murder of a 12-year-old child on 3rd January 2009 under FIR No.670 of 2007. He w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order of Assistant Executive Engineer in KPTCL Due to Non-Compliance with Transfer Policy and Lack of Prior Notice. Transfer of employee from Ballari to Raichur set aside as it violated the KPTCL Transfer Policy requiring minimum tenure and prior notice.

The petitioner, Sri Mallikarjun Gouda G.N., an Assistant Executive Engineer (V) in the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Remission Power Under Section 432 CrPC — Emphasizes Need for Application, Reasoned Orders, and Procedural Fairness. The Court held that suo motu remission is impermissible, conditions must be reasonable, automatic revocation invalid, and reasons must be recorded for rejection.

The Supreme Court, in a suo motu writ petition, examined the scope and limitations of the power of the appropriate Government to remit sentences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Convicts' Appeals on Premature Release Under Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 Due to Parole Period Exclusion. Period of Parole Counted as Remission Under Rule 335 and Excluded from Actual Imprisonment for Calculating 14-Year Requirement for Premature Release.

The dispute arose from convicts undergoing life imprisonment who applied for premature release under the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006, claiming they had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order for Lack of Prior Approval Based on Recorded Reasons. Chief Minister's Discretion Under Para 9(b) of Government Order No.DPAR 22 STR 2013 is Not Absolute.

The petitioner, Sri Rajashekar M., an Extension Officer in the Department of Backward Classes Welfare, challenged an order dated 25.09.2018 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Premature Retirement Order of General Manager in Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited Due to Non-Compliance with Service Rules. Transfer Order Set Aside as Punitive Without Proper Inquiry Under Relevant Service Rules.

The petitioner, Ram Mohan Sharma, an ex-General Manager of Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited (MECL), challenged two orders: a transfer order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Life Convict Seeking Premature Release — State's Order Requiring 26 Years Imprisonment Set Aside. Court holds that Government Resolution dated 15th March 2010 requires specific finding of exceptional violence to deny premature release after 14 years.

The petitioner, Santosh @ Sonu Balram Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment on 21st July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition for Premature Release in Murder Case — Co-accused's Release Not a Valid Ground for Parity. Petitioner's Sentence Period Including Remission Was Less Than 22 Years Required Under Clause 4(b) of Guidelines Dated 15th March, 2010.

The petitioner, Chintaman Sitaram Kedari, a life convict convicted under Sections 452, 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a Criminal Wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Premature Retirement of Deputy Director of Health Services. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and found the premature retirement order valid based on adverse entries and public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Mrs. Pratibha Gulhane, a retired Deputy Director of Health Services, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...