Search Results for "parole rejection"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Parole for Convict in NDPS Case Despite Bar Under Section 32A — Distinguishes Parole from Remission. The Court held that Section 32A of NDPS Act does not bar parole as parole is a temporary release for a specific purpose and not a remission or suspension of sentence.

The petitioner, Arjun S/o Lakkappa Hurakannavar, a convict under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), was serving his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convicts' Emergency Parole Petition for Suppression of Facts and Misleading Statements. Petitioners convicted in 1996 Bombay Blast case sought emergency parole under Maharashtra Prisons Rules but suppressed material facts regarding their parole history and overstays.

The petitioners, Asgar Kadar Sheikh and Mohd Yakub Abdul Majid Nagul, were convicts in the 1996 Bombay Blast case, serving sentences for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Furlough Rule Denying Furlough to Prisoners from Outside Maharashtra. Classification Based on Residence Held Reasonable Under Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Emergency Parole to Convict in POCSO and Rape Case for Father's Funeral. Rejection of Parole Solely on Ground of Heinous Offence Without Adverse Report Held Arbitrary Under Rule 19(1) of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

The petitioner, Baburao Marotrao Dakhore, was convicted by the Learned Sessions Court, Hingoli for offences punishable under Section 376(2)(H)(I)(N) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Parole Petition Due to Previous Abscondence and Discretionary Nature of Parole. Parole is a discretionary remedy granted only for specified contingencies like death or illness of relative, not for other reasons.

The petitioner, Gopal Hukka Bokshe, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of his application for parol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough for Prisoners Despite Past Overstay on Parole — Overstay Not a Permanent Bar Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough) Rules, 1959. The Court held that furlough is a right of a prisoner and past overstay on parole cannot be a permanent bar for grant of furlough.

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions filed by prisoners whose applications for furlough leave were rejected by the prison authorities o...