KAHC010137812018_1
14 Jan 2019...
Search Results for "notification quash"
1875 result(s) found
Found 1875 result(s)
High Court
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Lack of Public Purpose. Acquisition of Petitioners' Land for Archaeological Museum Set Aside as Notification Did Not Specify Public Purpose Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
11 Oct 2023The petitioners, Nidasheshi Veeranna and Gali Prakash, along with Gali Shivabasappa in the connected petition, owned agricultural lands in Sy.No.4/1 a...
- 42
High Court
- 19
High Court
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Co-operative Housing Society in CRZ-II Area Without Prior CRZ Clearance Under 2011 Notification — Stop Work Notice Quashed. The court held that para 8(iii) of the CRZ Notification 2011 permits redevelopment of existing authorized buildings in CRZ-II areas without prior CRZ clearance, and the stop work notice issued by MCZMA was invalid.
3 Sep 2014The petitioner, Sea Green Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is the lessee of land admeasuring approximately 1,672 sq. mtrs. in Worli, Mumbai, which f...
- 74
High Court
High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.
11 Jul 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Acquisition Notification for Petitioners' Land Due to Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. Notification held invalid for failing to specify the particular land and for not providing opportunity of hearing before declaration of slum area.
13 Apr 2023The petitioners, Yogesh Chandulal Mehta and Suresh Chandulal Mehta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes State Notification Making Certain IPC Offences Cognizable and Non-Bailable Under Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 — State Government Lacks Power to Amend CrPC by Executive Notification. The Court held that Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 does not empower the State Government to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the notification was ultra vires.
21 Jul 2010The petitioner, Shri Vishwajit P. Rane, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Notification dated...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Notification Exempting Light Motor Vehicles and MSRTC Buses from Toll on Sion-Panvel Highway. Dispute Arises from Concession Agreement Where Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Exemptions Cause Substantial Daily Revenue Loss and Contradicts Terms of Agreement.
8 Sep 2015The dispute arose from a concession agreement for widening and maintaining an arterial highway from Mumbai to Panvel, awarded to M/s Sion Panvel Tollw...
- 12
