Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards for Local Body Elections. Petitions Seek Quashing of Final Notification on Reservation Alleging Arbitrariness and Violation of Draft Notification.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-18 13:13:45
  • 89
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010000672019_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 21

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) c/w W.P. No.50796/2018, W.P.Nos.53609-53611/2018, and others

2019-01-14

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Abishek Marla M.J., Sri Ashok Haranahalli, Sri K.N.Phaneendra, Smt. Vaishali Hegde, Sri Vishwajith Shetty, Sri Dinesh Rao, Smt. Prathima Honnapura

Ravindra Nayak & Ors.

State of Karnataka & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging reservation of wards for municipal elections in Karnataka.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of final notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018 regarding reservation of wards and seeking directions to follow draft notifications or reserve wards for general category.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the final notifications arbitrarily altered the reservation of wards from the draft notifications, affecting their right to contest elections.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
reservation of wards local body elections quashing of notification municipal corporations ward reservation Articles 226 and 227 Karnataka State Election Commission Mangalore City Corporation draft notification general category

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Recovery of Half Salary Paid During Study Leave. Study Leave Regulations for Government Servants Only Provide for Half Pay Leave, Not Full Pay. 2026-09-19 01:52:59
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 198... 2026-09-19 01:52:55
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land Acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 11 Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrato...

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Central Excise Refund Interest Dispute Under Section ...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...

Supreme Court Upholds Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Under Specific Relief Act, 19...

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Appeal — Sets Aside NCL...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Lost Your Password?