Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation Notifications Issued Under Urban Development Department. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Direct Reservation of Wards in Accordance with Earlier Draft Notifications.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-11-01 08:20:34
  • 121
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010129732018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 79

W.P. No.44499/2018 c/w W.P. No.50796/2018 and other writ petitions

2019-01-14

Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Abishek Marla M.J., K.N. Phaneendra, Vaishali Hegde, Vishwajith Shetty, Dinesh Rao, Prathima Honnapura, S. Rajashekar

Mr. Ravindra Nayak

Karnataka State Election Commission, Mangalore City Corporation, State of Karnataka, Smt. Kavita Sanil, Sri Mahabala Marla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 challenging notifications regarding reservation of wards in urban local body elections, alleging deviation from draft notifications.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notification dated 10.08.2018 and directions to reserve wards as per draft notification dated 26.06.2018, specifically for Ward No.19 in the lead petition.

Filing Reason

The impugned notification altered ward reservation from the draft, impacting petitioners' electoral opportunities.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
ward reservation urban local bodies election notification draft notification Mangalore City Corporation

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Restoration Case Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Possession of Non-Tribal Purchaser Protected Due to Laches and Limitation. The court held that an application under Sect... 2026-11-01 09:02:49
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Petition by Income Tax Commissioner Against Deduction Claim. The court affirmed that the expression 'borne by the owner' refers to tax liability rather than actual payment, allowing deductions for municipal taxes under Section... 2026-11-01 09:02:48
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?