Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation Notifications Issued Under Urban Development Department. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Direct Reservation of Wards in Accordance with Earlier Draft Notifications.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-03 06:39:01
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010129732018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 79

W.P. No.44499/2018 c/w W.P. No.50796/2018 and other writ petitions

2019-01-14

Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Abishek Marla M.J., K.N. Phaneendra, Vaishali Hegde, Vishwajith Shetty, Dinesh Rao, Prathima Honnapura, S. Rajashekar

Mr. Ravindra Nayak

Karnataka State Election Commission, Mangalore City Corporation, State of Karnataka, Smt. Kavita Sanil, Sri Mahabala Marla

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 challenging notifications regarding reservation of wards in urban local body elections, alleging deviation from draft notifications.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notification dated 10.08.2018 and directions to reserve wards as per draft notification dated 26.06.2018, specifically for Ward No.19 in the lead petition.

Filing Reason

The impugned notification altered ward reservation from the draft, impacting petitioners' electoral opportunities.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
ward reservation urban local bodies election notification draft notification Mangalore City Corporation

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation Notifications Issued Under Urban Development Department. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Direct Reservation of Wards in Accordance with Earlier Draft Notif... 2026-08-03 06:39:01
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Rebut Presumption. Accused's Failure to Enter Witness Box and Lead Evidence Results in Confirmation of Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2026-08-03 06:39:00
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation burden of proof limitation benefit of doubt Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?