Search Results for "impleading legal representatives"

122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petitions Challenging Orders on Impleading and Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Held That Trial Court's Discretionary Orders Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Are Not Interfered With Under Article 227.

The case involves two Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, arising from a suit for specific performanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert, and Suit Property Not Identified.

The appellant, M/s. Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC against the judgment and decree dated 30.04.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Owner's Failure to Produce Driving License. Burden of Proof on Insurer to Show License Invalidity Under Section 149 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Parvati, who died in a road accident on 04.08.2012. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Impleadment of Legal Representatives as Defendants in Individual Capacity in Specific Performance Suit. Order I Rule 10 CPC Allows Addition of Necessary Parties Claiming Independent Rights in Suit Property Despite Already Being on Record as LRs.

The petitioner filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 11-11-2009 executed by the deceased defendant no.1 in respect of suit prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when the suit is clearly barred by limitation based on the averments in the plaint.

The appellant, Romesh Satyanarayan Sharma, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15.07.2005 against the respondents, Mrs...