Bombay High Court Allows Landlord to Sue Unknown Heirs in Eviction Proceedings — Procedure for Service by Substituted Service and Appointment of Administrator General. The court held that a landlord may file an eviction suit against 'heirs and legal representatives, if any' of a deceased tenant when their names and addresses are unknown, and the court may direct substituted service and appoint the Administrator General to represent the estate.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court addressed a procedural dilemma faced by landlords in Mumbai when a tenant dies and the landlord is unable to identify or locate the tenant's heirs. The petitioners, Trustees of the NM Petit Charity Fund, sought to evict the heirs of a deceased tenant, Jal Minocher Unwala, but could not ascertain their names or addresses. The court examined the interplay between the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) and the Administrator General's Act, 1963. It held that a landlord may file an eviction suit against 'heirs and legal representatives, if any' of the deceased tenant. The court may order substituted service under Order 5 Rule 20 CPC by affixing the summons at the tenanted premises and publishing in a local newspaper. If no heir appears, the court can proceed ex parte under Order 9 Rule 6 CPC. Additionally, the court may appoint the Administrator General under Section 10 of the Administrator General's Act, 1963, to represent the estate of the deceased tenant, ensuring that the estate is properly represented and the landlord's right to recover possession is not frustrated. The court emphasized that the landlord must make reasonable inquiries and file an affidavit detailing the steps taken to ascertain the heirs. The judgment provides a practical solution to a common problem in rent control litigation, balancing the landlord's right to property with the need to protect the interests of unknown heirs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Eviction Suit Against Unknown Heirs - Service of Summons - Where a landlord does not know the names or addresses of the heirs of a deceased tenant, the landlord may file a suit against 'heirs and legal representatives, if any' of the deceased tenant. The court may direct substituted service under Order 5 Rule 20 CPC by affixture at the tenanted premises and publication in a local newspaper. If no heir appears, the court may proceed ex parte under Order 9 Rule 6 CPC. (Paras 2-10)

B) Rent Control - Appointment of Administrator General - Representation of Estate - Under Section 10 of the Administrator General's Act, 1963, the Administrator General may be appointed to represent the estate of the deceased tenant in eviction proceedings when no heir comes forward. This ensures that the estate is properly represented and the landlord's right to recover possession is not frustrated. (Paras 11-15)

C) Civil Procedure - Substituted Service - Sufficiency - The court must be satisfied that the landlord has made reasonable inquiries to ascertain the heirs' identities and addresses. The landlord must file an affidavit detailing the steps taken. The court may also direct notice to the Administrator General to safeguard the interests of unknown heirs. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a landlord can file an eviction suit against 'heirs and legal representatives, if any' of a deceased tenant when the names and addresses of such heirs are unknown, and what procedure should be followed for service of summons and appointment of a representative.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court held that a landlord may file an eviction suit against 'heirs and legal representatives, if any' of a deceased tenant. The court may direct substituted service under Order 5 Rule 20 CPC by affixture at the tenanted premises and publication in a local newspaper. If no heir appears, the court may proceed ex parte under Order 9 Rule 6 CPC. Additionally, the court may appoint the Administrator General under Section 10 of the Administrator General's Act, 1963, to represent the estate of the deceased tenant. The petition was disposed of with these directions.

Law Points

  • Civil Procedure
  • Rent Control
  • Eviction of Unknown Heirs
  • Substituted Service
  • Administrator General's Act
  • 1963
  • Order 5 Rule 20 CPC
  • Order 9 Rule 6 CPC
  • Section 106 Transfer of Property Act
  • 1882
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (04) 104

Writ Petition No. 12449 of 2015

2018-04-11

G.S. Patel, J.

Mr PS Dani, Senior Advocate, with Mr Agnel Carneiro & Mr Vaibhav Shah, i/b Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe; Mr SG Adake, Administrator General present.

Trustees of The NM Petit Charity Fund & Ors

Heirs & Legal Representatives, if any, of late Mr Jal Minocher Unwala

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking guidance on procedure for eviction of unknown heirs of a deceased tenant.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners (landlord/trustees) sought a declaration that they could file an eviction suit against 'heirs and legal representatives, if any' of the deceased tenant and directions for service of summons and appointment of Administrator General.

Filing Reason

The landlord did not know the names or addresses of the heirs of the deceased tenant and faced procedural difficulties in filing an eviction suit.

Issues

Whether a landlord can file an eviction suit against 'heirs and legal representatives, if any' of a deceased tenant when their names and addresses are unknown. What procedure should be followed for service of summons in such a case? Whether the Administrator General can be appointed to represent the estate of the deceased tenant?

Submissions/Arguments

Mr Dani, Senior Advocate for the petitioners, argued that the landlord should be allowed to sue unknown heirs and that the court should direct substituted service and appoint the Administrator General to represent the estate. Mr SG Adake, Administrator General, submitted that he is willing to act as a representative of the estate under the Administrator General's Act, 1963.

Ratio Decidendi

A landlord may file an eviction suit against unknown heirs of a deceased tenant by describing them as 'heirs and legal representatives, if any'. The court may order substituted service and, if necessary, appoint the Administrator General to represent the estate to ensure proper representation and avoid frustration of the landlord's right to recover possession.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petition raises a narrow but, in my view, important question of both civil procedure and rent control legislation. What is the process that a landlord should follow to recover his property? Is it at all permissible for the landlord to bring a formal eviction action in the names of, for instance, the heirs and legal representatives, if any of the late tenant? I have also requested the presence of Mr SG Adake, the present Administrator General who exercises powers, performs duties and discharges functions under the Administrator General’s Act, 1963.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2015. It was initially linked with a group of other matters but was later segregated. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 11th April 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 5 Rule 20, Order 9 Rule 6
  • Administrator General's Act, 1963: Section 10
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882: Section 106
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Transfer of Group A Railway Officer — Transfer Order Upheld as Administrative Necessity. Petitioner's All India Service Liability and Lack of Malice Justify Transfer Under Railway Establishment Rules.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Disconnection by MSEB for Non-Payment of Dues. Public Trust's Claim of Exemption Under Section 3(1)(b) of Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958 Rejected as Trust Not Engaged in Agriculture...