Search Results for "electricity deposit"

650 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 650 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee's Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute — Holds Additional Demand Time-Barred for Disconnection Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. The two-year limitation for disconnection runs from the date of the original bill, not from discovery of a billing mistake.

The case involves a dispute between the Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (appellant/licensee) and Rahamatullah Khan alias Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Appeal by TANGEDCO in Electricity Connection Charges Dispute; Writ Court Order for Refund Under Challenge

The writ appeal arose from an order of a Single Judge allowing a writ petition filed by the private respondents, who had constructed 12 dwelling units...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Discharge in Electricity Theft Case Under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003. Court Holds That Use of Deceased Consumer's Meter by Legal Heir Without Transfer Constitutes Unauthorized Use and Theft of Electricity.

The appellant, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 7.7.2006 passed by the 4th Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows New Electricity Connection to Auction Purchaser Despite Previous Owner's Arrears. Refusal to Provide Connection on Ground of Unpaid Dues of Erstwhile Owner Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Subodhkumar Manikchand Jain, purchased a property through an auction conducted by the Provident Fund Department. The erstwhile owner h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against CESTAT Predeposit Order in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Cases. Electricity Consumption Norms for M.S. Ingots Require Prima Facie Case Assessment for Waiver of Predeposit.

The Bombay High Court heard six appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Electricity Board's Appeals in Illegal Disconnection Case — Board Cannot Claim Charges for Period of Its Own Wrongful Act. Initial Disconnection Without Considering Consumer's Instalment Request Violates Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Bihar State Electricity Board (appellant) and M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (respondent/company) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Directing Restoration of Electricity Without Payment of Arrears by Sublessee. Sublessee Must Pay Over Rs. 3 Crore in Arrears of Rent, Maintenance, and Electricity Charges Before Restoration.

The Supreme Court dealt with a special leave petition filed by Infinity Infotech Parks Limited (the petitioner) against an order of the Calcutta High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petition Against CGRF Order in Electricity Connection Cost Refund Dispute. Distribution Licensee Not Obligated to Refund Infrastructure Costs for Dedicated Distribution Transformer Under Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), a Distribution Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003, filed thre...