Search Results for "elected representative removal"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bye-Election to Fill Casual Vacancy in Katol Assembly Constituency. Section 151A of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Mandates Filling Casual Vacancy Within Six Months, and the Election Schedule Complies with the Statutory Time Limit.

The petitioner, Sandeep Yashwantrao Sarode, Chairman of Panchayat Samiti, Katol, and Director of Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol, filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Purshottam Tonpe, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Mahakal. Subsequently, he contested and won election to the Agriculture P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Challenge Raises Issue of Jurisdiction to Entertain Disqualification Complaint After Elections Without Filing Election Petition Under Section 15.

The writ petition arose from proceedings under the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The petitioner was elected from Ward No.4 of Gram Panchayat Kh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Removal of Municipal Councillors and Appointment of Administrator. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 41 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 in Removal Orders.

The matter comprised two writ petitions. W.P. No. 101601/2025 was filed by elected councillors of Gadag-Betageri City Municipal Council challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch in Corruption Case. Registration of FIR and arrest under Prevention of Corruption Act constitutes disgraceful conduct under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, justifying removal without awaiting conviction.

The petitioner, Dr. Narendra Purushottam Ingole, was elected as a Member of Gram Panchayat Wadki in June 2015 and subsequently elected as Sarpanch. A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Lack of Proper Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that removal without affording opportunity of hearing and without proper enquiry is unsustainable.

The petitioner, Shri Jagdish Mannalalji Sancheriya, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Anji (Mothi), District Wardha in March 2019 fo...