Search Results for "development plan rejection"

506 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Rejection of Change of Use Application for Stilt Parking Area under MRTP Act. Court rules that use of stilt area in cinema building cannot be changed without prior permission from planning authority as per sanctioned plan.

The dispute pertained to a writ petition filed by the petitioners, who claimed tenancy rights over a 2520 sq. ft. area in the Ganga-Jamuna Cinemas bui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.

The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Builders' Challenge to NMC's Refusal to Sanction Building Plans Based on Deemed Sanction Under Section 45(4) of MRTP Act. Court holds that failure to communicate objections within prescribed period results in deemed sanction, and subsequent refusal is invalid.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Gowardhan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Vedbhoomi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. against t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development Plan Reservation and TDR Compensation in Kolhapur. Court upholds reservation of land for playground and finds that TDR is valid compensation under MRTP Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by M/s. Bhima Mahabharat Builders and Developers, Zakir Nasirruddin Peerzade, and Anand rao Mahadeo M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Reservation on Property Under Section 127(1) of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Petitioners' land reserved for road in development plan since 2002/2004 held to have lapsed as no acquisition proceedings were initiated within the statutory period.

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Sy. No. 466/2+3 at village Mehrun, Jalgaon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act – Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years. Reservation of land for public purpose lapses as acquiring body failed to take steps within prescribed period under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, co-owners of ancestral land in Chehedi village within Nashik Municipal Corporation limits, filed a writ petition seeking a declaratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Landowner Held Entitled to Develop Land After Reservation Lapses Automatically Without Need for Representation.

The petitioner, Pralhad Tulsiram Bundele, owned land bearing Survey No.31/4, area 1.09 HR, at Village Khel Traymbak Narayan, Taluka Achalpur, District...