Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Landowner Held Entitled to Develop Land After Reservation Lapses Automatically Without Need for Representation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Pralhad Tulsiram Bundele, owned land bearing Survey No.31/4, area 1.09 HR, at Village Khel Traymbak Narayan, Taluka Achalpur, District Amravati. The land was reserved for a garden (Reservation No.57) in the 1st revised development plan and for a playground in the excluded part of the development plan of Achalpur city. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the reservation had lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act), as the respondents had not acquired the land within ten years from the date of the reservation. The petitioner also sought a direction to the respondents to notify the lapsing in the official gazette. The respondents opposed the petition, arguing that the reservation was still valid and that the petitioner had not made any representation for de-reservation. The High Court examined the provisions of Section 127 of the MRTP Act, which states that if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within ten years from the date of the reservation, the reservation lapses, and the landowner is free to develop the land. The Court found that the reservation was made in the 1st revised development plan, which came into effect on 24th October 2002, and more than ten years had elapsed without any acquisition proceedings. The Court rejected the respondents' argument that the petitioner should have made a representation, holding that the lapsing is automatic. The Court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation had lapsed, and directed the respondents to issue a notification under Section 127(2) within eight weeks.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Lapsing of Reservation - Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - The petitioner sought declaration that reservation on his land for garden and playground had lapsed as no acquisition proceedings were initiated within ten years from the date of reservation. The Court held that the reservation lapses automatically under Section 127 if no steps for acquisition are taken within the prescribed period, and the landowner becomes free to develop the land in accordance with the development plan. (Paras 1-27)

B) Town Planning - Mandatory Duty to Notify Lapsing - Section 127(2) of MRTP Act - The Court directed the respondents to issue a notification under Section 127(2) within eight weeks, declaring that the reservation has lapsed, as the statutory obligation to notify arises once the period expires without acquisition. (Paras 25-27)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land for garden and playground purposes has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, due to non-acquisition within the prescribed period, and whether the petitioner is entitled to a declaration to that effect.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation on the petitioner's land for garden and playground purposes has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act. The respondents were directed to issue a notification under Section 127(2) within eight weeks, and the petitioner is free to develop the land in accordance with the development plan.

Law Points

  • Lapsing of reservation under Section 127 of MRTP Act
  • 1966
  • Non-acquisition within ten years
  • Right to develop land after lapsing
  • Mandatory duty to notify lapsing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 214

Writ Petition No.8258 of 2022

2023-10-20

Prithviraj K. Chavan, Urmila Joshi-Phalke

2023:BHC-NAG:15501-DB

Mr. G.K. Mundhada for Petitioner, Ms. K.R. Deshpande A.G.P for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. Yash Jaiswal for Respondent No.3

Pralhad Tulsiram Bundele

State of Maharashtra through Secretary Urban Development Department, Director of Town Planning, Municipal Council / Nagar Parishad Achalpur, Assistant Director of Town Planning

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking declaration that land reservation has lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act and direction to notify lapsing.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that reservation for garden and playground on petitioner's land has lapsed, and direction to respondents to notify lapsing in official gazette.

Filing Reason

Respondents failed to acquire the land within ten years from the date of reservation, causing the reservation to lapse under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the petitioner's land has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to non-acquisition within ten years. Whether the respondents are obligated to issue a notification under Section 127(2) declaring the lapsing.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the reservation was made in the 1st revised development plan effective from 24th October 2002, and no acquisition proceedings were initiated within ten years, hence the reservation lapsed automatically under Section 127. Respondents contended that the reservation is still valid and the petitioner did not make any representation for de-reservation, and that the lapsing is not automatic.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within ten years from the date of reservation, the reservation lapses automatically, and the landowner is entitled to develop the land. The lapsing does not require any representation from the landowner, and the authorities have a mandatory duty to notify the lapsing.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has made following substantive prayers; (A) Declare that the reservation for purpose of Garden vide Reservation no.57 as per 1st revised development plan and reservation for purpose of Play Ground vide Reservation no.57 as per the Excluded Part of the Development plan affecting the land owned by the petitioner ... has lapsed under Sec. 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 ... Rule is made returnable forthwith and taken up for final hearing by consent of learned Counsel for the parties.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.8258 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking declaration of lapsing of reservation under Section 127 of MRTP Act. The petition was heard and reserved on 13th October 2023, and judgment was pronounced on 20th October 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 127
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor Girl — Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical and Circumstantial Evidence. The conviction under Sections 366, 376(1)(f), 354, and 506(II)...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition: Suspension of City Engineer Deemed Ceased After Six Months Without Corporation Confirmation Under Section 56(1) Proviso (b) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act. The Court held that the mandatory requireme...