Search Results for "delayed allotment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "delayed allotment"

326 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 326 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Delhi Development Authority's Appeal in Land Allotment Dispute, Quashing High Court's Direction for Allotment. Court Holds That Internal Notings and In-Principle Approval Do Not Confer Vested Rights, and Policy Change from Allotment to Auction Applies to Pending Cases Under Delhi Development Authority (Disposal of Developed Nazul Land) Rules, 1981 and Amendment Rules, 2006.

11 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from the Delhi Development Authority's appeal against the High Court of Delhi's judgment directing allotment of land to Hello Home E...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Admission of Meritorious SC Student in IIT Dhanbad Under Article 142 Despite Technical Glitch in Fee Payment. The Court directed creation of a supernumerary seat and held that a student who made diligent efforts should not suffer for no fault of his.

30 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Atul Kumar, a meritorious student belonging to the Scheduled Caste category, appeared for the JEE (Advanced) 2024 Examination and secu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Implementation of Town Planning Scheme and Handover of Final Plot — Delay and Laches Bar Relief After 47 Years. Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India dismissed as petitioners failed to act for 47 years after finalization of scheme under Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915.

11 Oct 2011

The petitioners, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Orders Refund to Homebuyer in Vatika India Next Project - Consumer Protection Act Applies to Plot Allotment Despite Arbitration Clause - Deficiency in Service Established for Delayed Possession

23 Jan 2025

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed a consumer complaint filed by Complainant( s) against Opp.Party(s) for deficiency in servi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Plot Allotment and Forfeiture by CIDCO — Directs Issuance of Demand Letter for Second Installment with Late Payment Charges. The court held that the cancellation was arbitrary and violative of legitimate expectation, as CIDCO itself had sought relaxation of time limits under Regulation 15 of the New Bombay Disposal Land Regulations, 1975, which was approved by the State Government.

10 Sep 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Trishul Construction Co., was allotted three plots by CIDCO (respondent No.1) in 2007. The payment schedule required a first inst...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Bid and Forfeiture of EMD for Delayed Payment in BDA E-Auction. Time for payment of 25% bid amount was of essence; failure to deposit within 72 hours justified cancellation and forfeiture.

27 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Srinivas H., participated in an e-auction conducted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) on 9.12.2014 for the allotment of sit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to MMRDA's Additional Premium Demand — Interpretation of Articles 2(c), 2(d), 2(e) of Lease Deed and Impact of Supplementary Lease Deed. The Court Examines Whether Delay in Construction Attributable to MMRDA's Approvals and Absence of Time Limit for Additional Built-Up Area Renders Demand Arbitrary.

8 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from a demand notice issued by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) to the Indian Newspaper Society (the pet...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)