Supreme Court Allows Admission of Meritorious SC Student in IIT Dhanbad Under Article 142 Despite Technical Glitch in Fee Payment. The Court directed creation of a supernumerary seat and held that a student who made diligent efforts should not suffer for no fault of his.

In Favour of Accused
  • 797
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Atul Kumar, a meritorious student belonging to the Scheduled Caste category, appeared for the JEE (Advanced) 2024 Examination and secured a rank of 1455 in his category. He was allotted a seat at IIT Dhanbad for a four-year Bachelor of Technology course in Electrical Engineering. This was his second and last attempt. His father is a daily wager, and the family income is below the poverty line. The deadline for online reporting, including fee payment and document upload, was 5 pm on 24 June 2024. The petitioner's parents arranged the fees, which were deposited in his brother's account by 4:45 pm. The petitioner logged into the portal at 4:45 pm, applied in the 'float category', and uploaded documents. However, the portal closed at 5 pm, and his payment was not processed. He emailed the first respondent and received a response redirecting him to IIT Madras, but his attempts were unsuccessful. He approached the Jharkhand High Court Legal Aid Service Committee, was directed to the Madras High Court Legal Services Committee, and filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court, which advised him to approach the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court noted that there was no dispute about the allotment, his SC status, and his steps to comply with formalities. The Court observed from the log-in details that the petitioner logged in six times between 15:12 and 16:57 hours on 24 June 2024, indicating earnest efforts. The Court held that a talented student from a marginalized background should not be left in the lurch due to a technical glitch. Exercising power under Article 142, the Court directed that the petitioner be granted admission to IIT Dhanbad in Electrical Engineering, with a supernumerary seat created if necessary, and no existing student disturbed. The petitioner is to pay Rs 17,500 fees at the time of admission and is entitled to all consequential benefits including hostel accommodation. The Court also requested the Director of IIT Dhanbad to ensure the petitioner can complete the coursework for the elapsed period.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Article 142 - Complete Justice - Technical Glitch in Fee Payment - The Supreme Court exercised its power under Article 142 to direct admission of a meritorious SC student who made diligent efforts to pay fees and upload documents within the deadline but could not due to a technical glitch. The Court held that the student should not suffer for no fault of his and ordered creation of a supernumerary seat if necessary. (Paras 6-7)

B) Education Law - Admission - Technical Glitch - Diligent Efforts - The Court noted that the petitioner logged in six times on the last day and did everything within his power. The Court held that a talented student from a marginalized background should not be left in the lurch due to a technical issue. (Paras 5-6)

C) Constitutional Law - Article 142 - Supernumerary Seat - The Court directed that a supernumerary seat be created for the petitioner if required, and no existing student shall be disturbed. The petitioner is entitled to all consequential benefits including hostel accommodation. (Para 7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a meritorious Scheduled Caste student who made earnest efforts to pay fees and upload documents within the deadline but failed due to a technical glitch should be granted admission under Article 142 of the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the petition and directed that the petitioner be granted admission to IIT Dhanbad in Electrical Engineering. A supernumerary seat shall be created if required, and no existing student shall be disturbed. The petitioner shall pay Rs 17,500 fees at the time of admission and is entitled to all consequential benefits including hostel accommodation. The Director of IIT Dhanbad is requested to ensure the petitioner can complete the coursework for the elapsed period.

Law Points

  • Article 142 of the Constitution
  • power to do complete justice
  • technical glitch in fee payment
  • earnest efforts by student
  • no fault of student
  • supernumerary seat creation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (SC) (9) 303

Writ Petition (Civil) No 609 of 2024

2024-09-30

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Manoj Misra

2024 INSC 749

Atul Kumar

The Chairman (Joint Seat Allocation Authority) and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking admission to IIT Dhanbad despite failure to pay fees due to technical glitch.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the respondents to grant admission to the petitioner in the allotted seat.

Filing Reason

The petitioner could not pay fees and upload documents within the deadline due to a technical glitch, and his subsequent representations were not successful.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner approached the Jharkhand High Court Legal Aid Service Committee, then the Madras High Court Legal Services Committee, and filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court, which advised him to approach the Supreme Court.

Issues

Whether the petitioner should be granted admission despite the technical glitch in fee payment. Whether the Supreme Court can exercise its power under Article 142 to do complete justice in such circumstances.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that he made earnest efforts to pay fees and upload documents within the deadline, but the portal closed before his payment was processed. The first respondent provided log-in details showing the petitioner logged in six times on the last day, indicating diligence.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that under Article 142 of the Constitution, it can do complete justice to prevent a meritorious student from suffering due to a technical glitch beyond his control. The petitioner's diligent efforts and marginalized background weighed in favor of granting admission.

Judgment Excerpts

The power of this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution to do substantial justice is meant precisely to cover such a situation. A talented student like the petitioner who belongs to a marginalized group of citizens and has done everything to secure admission should not be left in the lurch.

Procedural History

The petitioner was allotted a seat at IIT Dhanbad on 24 June 2024. He attempted to pay fees and upload documents but failed due to a technical glitch. He emailed the first respondent and was redirected to IIT Madras. He approached the Jharkhand High Court Legal Aid Service Committee, then the Madras High Court Legal Services Committee, and filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court, which advised him to approach the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court heard the matter and disposed of the petition on 30 September 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 142
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-2016 Due to Non-Compliance with Section 148A and Invalid Sanction. Reassessment proceedings set aside as notice issued after 01.04.2021 without following mandatory procedure under Section 148...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Interim Arbitral Award — Arbitrator's Power to Grant Interim Relief Under Section 41(b) of Arbitration Act, 1940 Upheld. The court held that an arbitrator has the power to grant interim re...