Search Results for "charge sheet after retirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "charge sheet after retirement"

247 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of RBI Employee for Non-Application of Mind. RBI's order set aside as review committee failed to consider petitioner's representation and relied on stale adverse remarks without assessing current performance.

10 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Animesh Bakuli, was an employee of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) who was compulsorily retired from service by an order dated 13th Fe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Bank Officer — Disciplinary Enquiry Cannot Be Initiated After Superannuation Without Specific Statutory Provision. The court held that under the Punjab National Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995, disciplinary proceedings can only be continued if instituted before retirement, and the charge-sheet issued after superannuation was invalid.

24 Apr 2026

The petitioner, a former General Manager of Punjab National Bank, retired on superannuation on 31st March 2017. After his retirement, the bank issued ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Interest on Delayed Retiral Benefits to Exonerated Employee — Rule 55A(7) of Pension Rules, 1953 Deems Payment Due from Retirement Date, Not Exoneration Date, and Interest Is Payable Without Proving Administrative Lapse.

11 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Narayan Pundalik Pathade, a retired employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Articl...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Pensionary Benefits Due to Forfeiture of Past Service for Unauthorized Absence. Past Service Forfeiture Under Rule 27 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 and Penalty of Compulsory Retirement Not Challenged, Hence Entitlement to Pension Cannot Be Claimed.

12 Sep 2024

The petitioner, a government servant, was appointed as a Peon in 1996 and later promoted to Assistant. He absented himself from duty from 02.05.2012. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Case — Resignation Not Convertible to Voluntary Retirement; Gratuity Payable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court held that voluntary retirement requires acceptance by the appointing authority and pending disciplinary proceedings justify non-acceptance; resignation cannot be converted to voluntary retirement after acceptance and receipt of benefits.

15 Apr 2020

The case involves an appeal by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation against a High Court order directing them to treat the respondent's dece...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension by Syndicate Bank — Violation of Natural Justice and Pension Regulations. Reduction of two-third pension without show cause notice set aside; bank directed to restore full pension and pay arrears.

17 Jul 2015

The petitioner, B. Narayana Rao, was appointed as a Clerk in Syndicate Bank on 22.5.1972 and rose to the position of Senior Manager in Grade Scale-V b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Continuation of Disciplinary Proceedings After Retirement Without Sanction of Pensionary Benefits. Disciplinary proceedings cannot continue after retirement as employer-employee relationship ceases; pensionary benefits cannot be withheld without specific rule.

29 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Mrs. Pratibha Ashok Salvekar, was a retired officer of Allahabad Bank who had served from 1974 until her retirement on 30th April 2011...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Withholding of Pension for Misconduct in Municipal Corporation Cases. Pensionary benefits can be withheld under Pension Rules for misconduct committed during service, even after retirement, if proceedings are initiated within a reasonable time.

3 Feb 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by former employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (now Mumbai) challenging the Commiss...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)