Search Results for "Retiral benefits"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Retiral benefits"

501 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 501 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

15 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Release of Retiral Benefits to Employee in Caste Claim Case — Protection Granted Under Kavita Solunke Judgment and Office Memorandum. Employee's Appointment Became Final Before 28th November 2000, Entitling Him to Retiral Benefits Despite Invalidated Caste Claim.

30 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Ramesh Mahadeo Dhakate, was appointed as a Clerk on 29th November 1969 against a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe, claiming to belong...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retiral Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Invalidated Tribe Claim — Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Withheld for Invalid Caste Claim After Superannuation. The court held that the right to pension is a right earned by past service and cannot be forfeited after retirement under Rule 27 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

1 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Ramesh s/o Mahadeorao Ukande, was appointed as an Observer in the India Meteorological Department on 19.11.1986 against a post reserve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Retiral Benefits for Retired Lecturer of Unaided Art School After Grant-in-Aid Sanction. Entire service from 1993 to 2010 must be considered for pension and other benefits under the Maharashtra Grant-in-Aid Rules.

2 Dec 2021

The petitioners, Prakash Arjun Rajeshirke (an individual) and Sahyadri Shikshan Sanstha (an educational trust), filed a writ petition under Article 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Earlier Option for Contributory Provident Fund. Government Resolution dated 20.02.1985 permits switch to pension scheme for employees who opted for CPF before the resolution.

21 Sep 2022

The petitioner, A. N. Radha, a retired employee aged 65, filed a writ petition seeking pensionary benefits and gratuity under the Pension Scheme and D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to Ayurvedic College Teachers Who Voluntarily Retired or Resigned After Qualifying Service. Employees of aided Ayurvedic, Unani, and Homeopathic educational institutions are entitled to pension and gratuity benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, read with the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

28 Feb 2019

The petitioners, five retired doctors and one other employee, were employed at various aided Ayurvedic, Unani, and Homeopathic educational institution...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Pension Claims of Former U.P. Roadways Employees Absorbed in Corporation - Employees Not Holding Pensionable Posts Under U.P. Civil Service Regulations. The Court held that employees of a temporary department of the State Government, absorbed in a statutory corporation, are not entitled to pension as they did not hold pensionable posts under the U.P. Civil Service Regulations.

26 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by former employees of Uttar Pradesh Roadways (a temporary department of the State Governme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Pension Fixation for Retired Teacher from De-recognised School — Surplus Employee Entitled to Retiral Benefits Under MEPS Rules, 1981. Teacher rendered 28 years of service in aided school; school closed due to de-recognition; court orders pension from date of closure or superannuation with 12% interest.

14 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Shri Charandas Marotrao Ramteke, was an Assistant Teacher in a school run by respondent no.2 Sanstha from 1969 until the school was de...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by BESCOM Against Direction to Pay Retiral Benefits, Holding That Disciplinary Proceedings Can Be Initiated After Retirement Under Relevant Regulations. The court set aside the Single Judge's order and remanded for consideration of Regulation 16 of the Karnataka Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations, 1997.

3 Sep 2025

The appellant, Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM), filed a writ appeal against an order dated 11.07.2024 passed by a learned Single...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Assesses Whether Rule 48-B of Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972 Applies Retrospectively to Employees Who Voluntarily Retired Before Its Enactment. The Court Relied on D.S. Nakara to Emphasize that Pension is a Vested Right and Not a Bounty, a Principle Central to Determining the Rule's Temporal Scope.

29 Mar 2005

The matter arose from a writ petition filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by the Union of India and the Accountant General (A&E)-I, Ma...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)