Bombay High Court Directs Pension Fixation for Retired Teacher from De-recognised School — Surplus Employee Entitled to Retiral Benefits Under MEPS Rules, 1981. Teacher rendered 28 years of service in aided school; school closed due to de-recognition; court orders pension from date of closure or superannuation with 12% interest.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 36
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shri Charandas Marotrao Ramteke, was an Assistant Teacher in a school run by respondent no.2 Sanstha from 1969 until the school was de-recognised in 1997 and closed on 24.05.1999. He rendered 28 years of service. After closure, he was declared surplus and his name was included in a waiting list for absorption in another school vide letter dated 05.05.2000. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions to fix his pension as per rules showing the date of retirement as 24.05.2002 or 24.05.1999, and to pay pension, gratuity, and other retiral benefits including State contribution in GPF with interest at 12% per annum. The learned AGP did not dispute the factual position of the petitioner's service or the closure. The Court, after hearing both sides, held that the petitioner is entitled to pension and other retiral benefits. It directed the respondents to fix the petitioner's pension showing the date of retirement as 24.05.2002 or 24.05.1999, and to make payment of pension, gratuity, and all other retiral benefits including State contribution in GPF along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pension - Surplus Employee - Closure of School - Petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, rendered 28 years of service in an aided school run by respondent no.2 Sanstha. The school was de-recognised in 1997 and closed on 24.05.1999. Petitioner was declared surplus and his name was included in the waiting list for absorption. He claimed pension and retiral benefits from the date of closure or from his superannuation date. The Court held that the petitioner is entitled to pension and other retiral benefits as per rules, and directed the respondents to fix his pension showing the date of retirement as 24.05.2002 or 24.05.1999, and to make payment of pension, gratuity, and other retiral benefits including State contribution in GPF with interest at 12% per annum. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a teacher rendered surplus due to closure of a de-recognised aided school is entitled to pension and other retiral benefits from the date of closure or from the date of superannuation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed the respondents to fix the pension of the petitioner as per rules showing the date of retirement as 24.05.2002 or 24.05.1999, and to make payment of pension, gratuity, and all other retiral benefits including contribution by State in GPF along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.

Law Points

  • Pension entitlement
  • surplus employee
  • closure of school
  • de-recognition
  • absorption
  • retiral benefits
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules
  • 1981
  • Rule 25A
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 211

WRIT PETITION NO. 725/2006

2017-07-14

R.K. Deshpande, Mrs. Swapna Joshi

Mr. Shashikant Borkar (for petitioner), Mr. V.P. Maldhure (Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 & 3)

Shri Charandas Marotrao Ramteke

State of Maharashtra, Navyuvak Samaj Vikas Shikshan Sanstha, Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Bhandara

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking pension and retiral benefits for a teacher rendered surplus due to closure of a de-recognised aided school.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought directions to fix his pension showing date of retirement as 24.05.2002 or 24.05.1999, and to pay pension, gratuity, and other retiral benefits including State contribution in GPF with interest at 12% per annum.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was not granted pension and retiral benefits after the school closed down on 24.05.1999.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to pension and other retiral benefits from the date of closure of the school or from the date of superannuation.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner contended that he rendered 28 years of service and was entitled to absorption under Rule 25A of the MEPS Rules, 1981, and to pension and retiral benefits. Respondents did not dispute the factual position of the petitioner's service and closure of the school.

Ratio Decidendi

A teacher rendered surplus due to closure of a de-recognised aided school, having rendered pensionable service, is entitled to pension and other retiral benefits from the date of closure or superannuation, and the State is liable to pay such benefits with interest.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the petitioner, inter alia, prays as under : (i) By suitable writ or directions the respondent be kindly directed to fix the pension of the petitioner as per rules showing the date of retirement as 24.5.2002, or at any rate 24.5.1999 when the School was closed. The petitioner was working as an Assistant Teacher in a School run by respondent no.2 Sanstha from 1969 till the school was de-recognised in the year 1997 and the School was closed down on 24.05.1999. Learned A.G.P. did not dispute the factual position of the petitioner rendering 28 years of service in aided School and the closure of the School on account of de-recognition.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 725/2006 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking pension and retiral benefits. The petition was heard on 01.07.2017 and judgment pronounced on 14.07.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981: Rule 25A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Pension Fixation for Retired Teacher from De-recognised School — Surplus Employee Entitled to Retiral Benefits Under MEPS Rules, 1981. Teacher rendered 28 years of service in aided school; school closed due to de-recogniti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging School Tribunal Orders on Maintainability of Appeals Under MEPS Act. Show Cause Notice Does Not Constitute Termination Under Section 9 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Serv...